|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
04/02/2020 |
Actualizado : |
04/02/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
DEBLITZ, C.; BORBELY, C.; CHARRY, A.A.; COSTA, F.P.; VON DAVIER, Z.; FERNANDEZ, E.; GRABNER, R.; HASHMI, A.H.; IZQUIERDO, L.; JAKOBE, P.; KLAPKA, J.; MAHMOOD, K.; OSTROWSKI, B.; PARTON. K.; PEREIRA, M.; RAS, C.H.; REYES, E.; RICHARDSON, J.W.; SARZEAUD, P.; SWITLYK, M.; SZABO, K.; THORNE, F.; WILCZYNSKI, A. |
Afiliación : |
C. DEBLITZ, Institute of Farm Economics, FAL, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany; C. BORBELY, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary; A. A. CHARRY, University of Sydney, Faculty of Rural Management, Orange, NSW, Australia; F. P. COSTA, EMBRAPA Gado de Corte, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, Brazil; Z. VON DAVIER, FAL Fed. Agric. Research Centre, Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; R. GRABNER, Chamber of Agriculture Styria, Weiz, Austria; A. H. HASHMI, Small and Medium Entpr. Devmt. Auth., Pakistan; L. IZQUIERDO, FAL Fed. Agric. Research Centre, Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany; P. JAKOBE, Res. Inst. of Agricultural Economics, Praha, Czech Republic; J. KLAPKA, J., Agricultural Research Institute, Kromeríz, Czech Republic; K. MAHMOOD, Agric. Policy Studies Institute, Lahore, Pakistan; B. OSTROWSKI, Cátedra de Admin. Rural, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; K. PARTON, University of Sydney, Faculty of Rural Management, Orange, NSW, Australia; M. PEREIRA, EMBRAPA Gado de Corte, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, Brazil; C. H. RAS, Cátedra de Admin. Rural, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; E. REYES, Animal Health and Livestock Services, TRAGSEGA, Madrid, Spain; J. W. RICHARDSON, Texas A and M University, Agricultural Food Policy Centre, Department of Agricultural Economics, College Station, TX, United States; P. SARZEAUD, Dept. Action Régionale, Institut de l'Élevage, Rennes, France; M. SWITLYK, University of Szczecin, Institute of Management, Szczecin, Poland; K. SZABO, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary; F. THORNE, TEAGASC, Dublin, Ireland; A. WILCZYNSKI, University of Szczecin, Institute of Management, Szczecin, Poland. |
Título : |
Status quo and prospects of beef production world-wide. (Review) |
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Landbauforschung Völkenrode, December 2004, Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 237-249. |
Descripción física : |
2-s2.0-9944252565 |
ISSN : |
0458-6859 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potential lays in intensification rather than making additional land resources available for beef production. In the next ten years, a world-wide increase of beef production as well as world trade can be expected. In some countries the increases of production are likely to be at least partially offset by consumption in the short term (China) or over the long term (Brazil). MenosABSTRACT.
The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potenti... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Beef production; International competitiveness. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
Marc : |
LEADER 03052naa a2200445 a 4500 001 1060762 005 2020-02-04 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0458-6859 100 1 $aDEBLITZ, C. 245 $aStatus quo and prospects of beef production world-wide. (Review)$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2004 300 $c2-s2.0-9944252565 500 $aArticle history: 520 $aABSTRACT. The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potential lays in intensification rather than making additional land resources available for beef production. In the next ten years, a world-wide increase of beef production as well as world trade can be expected. In some countries the increases of production are likely to be at least partially offset by consumption in the short term (China) or over the long term (Brazil). 653 $aBeef production 653 $aInternational competitiveness 700 1 $aBORBELY, C. 700 1 $aCHARRY, A.A. 700 1 $aCOSTA, F.P. 700 1 $aVON DAVIER, Z. 700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E. 700 1 $aGRABNER, R. 700 1 $aHASHMI, A.H. 700 1 $aIZQUIERDO, L. 700 1 $aJAKOBE, P. 700 1 $aKLAPKA, J. 700 1 $aMAHMOOD, K. 700 1 $aOSTROWSKI, B. 700 1 $aPARTON. K. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, M. 700 1 $aRAS, C.H. 700 1 $aREYES, E. 700 1 $aRICHARDSON, J.W. 700 1 $aSARZEAUD, P. 700 1 $aSWITLYK, M. 700 1 $aSZABO, K. 700 1 $aTHORNE, F. 700 1 $aWILCZYNSKI, A. 773 $tLandbauforschung Völkenrode, December 2004, Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 237-249.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registros recuperados : 8 | |
3. |  | GANZÁBAL, A.; MARTÍNEZ, F.; GARCÍA PINTOS, J.; URIOSTE, G.; DYPPOLITO, F.; ROJAS. J.; CAMPANELLA, L.; GARCÍA DA ROSA, D. Fondos rotatorios, asociativismo y extensión para el desarrollo de la producción ovina en pequeña escala. Proyecto Regional ANDE - MJA. Producción Animal. Revista INIA Uruguay, Junio 2021, no.65, p.30-34. (Revista INIA; 65).Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
4. |  | GANZÁBAL, A.; URIOSTE, G.; GARCÍA PINTOS, J.; MARTÍNEZ, F.; FERREIRA, A.; ORTICOCHEA, A.; PERALTA, M.; ESPINOSA, M.; CAMPANELLA, L.; TORRES, A.; GARCÍA DA ROSA, D. Exitosas experiencias de extensión para el fomento de la producción ovina en pequeña y mediana escala. Proyecto ANDE - Intendencia de Florida - OPP. Producción Animal. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2020, no.63, p.11-14. (Revista INIA; 63).Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
5. |  | FASIOLO, C.; VIETA, A.; ORIHUELA, C.; WATERSTON, S.; IURATO, A.; PRIMO, P.; MARTÍNEZ, F.; GODÍN, A.; VIANA, V.; BAO, L.; LORENZO, E.; GALVÁN, G. FPTA 383: Programa de integración de herramientas biológicas y culturales para el control de plagas y enfermedades en horticultura. Proyectos FPTA. Revista INIA Uruguay, Marzo 2024, no.76, p.86-88. (Revista INIA; 76).Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
6. |  | VIETA, A.; ORIHUELA, C.; FASIOLO, C.; BAO, L.; LORENZO, E.; GALVÁN, G.; WATERSTON, S.; IURATO, A.; PRIMO, P.; MARTÍNEZ, F-; GODÍN, A.; VIANA, V. FPTA 383: Programa de integración de herramientas biológicas y culturales para el control de plagas y enfermedades en horticultura. Proyectos FPTA. Revista INIA Uruguay, Marzo 2023, no.72, p.112-114. (Revista INIA; 72).Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
7. |  | GANZÁBAL, A.; MARTÍNEZ, F.; FERREIRA, A.; ARROSPIDE, D.; LADOS, E.; AGUIRRE, M.; PERALTA, M.; CEDRÉS, D.; CAMPANELLA, L.; GARCÍA DA ROSA, D.; URIOSTE, G. Majada cooperaria: una nueva herramienta de desarrollo para una ovinocultura emergente. Revista INIA Uruguay, Setiembre 2021, no.66, p. 21-24. (Revista INIA; 66).Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
8. |  | VIETA, A.; ORIHUELA, C.; FASIOLO, C.; BAO, L.; GALVÁN, G.; BANCHERO, L.; IURATO, A.; GODÍN, A.; PRIMO, P.; WATERSTON, S.; MARTÍNEZ, F.; VIANA, V. Introducción de agentes de control biológico en el manejo integrado de plagas en horticultura. O17. Módulo 5: Desarrollos y perspectivas de empresas productoras y usuarias de bioinsumos. In: Abreo, E.; Beyhaut, E.; Rivas, F. (Eds.). Simposio Microorganismos para la Agricultura, 2. [Resúmenes y Posters]. Canelones (UY): INIA, 2022. p.37. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 801).Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
Registros recuperados : 8 | |
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|