| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
| 2. |  | RUBIO, V.; NÚÑEZ, A.; BERGER, A.; VAN ES, H. Biomass inputs drive agronomic management impacts on soil health. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2025, Volume 378, 109316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109316 -- OPEN ACCESS Article history: Received 21 February 2024, Revised 20 August 2024, Accepted 28 September 2024, Available online 9 October 2024, Version of Record 9 October 2024, To be published 1 February 2025. -- Correspondence: Rubio, V.; Estación...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 3. | | RUBIO, V.; DIAZ-ROSELLO, R.; QUINCKE, A.; VAN ES H.M. Quantifying soil organic carbon's critical role in cereal productivity losses under annualized crop rotations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2021, Volume 321, Article number 107607. Open Access. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107607 Article history: Received 29 October 2020, Revised 16 June 2021, Accepted 30 July 2021, Available online 13 August 2021, To be published 1 November 2021.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
23/12/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
23/12/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
LEITE, F.F.G.D.; ALVES, B.J.R.; NÓBREGA, G.N.; CORDEIRO, R.C.; CESÁRIO, F.V.; CAMBARERI, G.S.; FAVERIN, C.; DA SILVEIRA, J.G.; CIGANDA, V.; ARMACOLO, N.M.; ALECRIM, F.B.; RODRIGUES, R.D.A.R. |
|
Afiliación : |
FERNANDA FIGUEIREDO GRANJA DORILÊO LEITE, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências (Geoquímica), Departamento de Geoquímica, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.; BRUNO JOSE RODRIGUES ALVES, Embrapa Agrobiologia, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.; GABRIEL NUTO NÓBREGA, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências (Geoquímica), Departamento de Geoquímica, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.; RENATO CAMPELLO CORDEIRO, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências (Geoquímica), Departamento de Geoquímica, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.; FERNANDO VIEIRA CESÁRIO, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Biossistemas, Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola e Meio Ambiente, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, Brazil.; GUSTAVO SEBASTIAN CAMBARERI, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; CLAUDIA FAVERIN, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; JULIA GRAZIELA DA SILVEIRA, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, MG, Brazil.; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA BRASCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NATASSIA MAGALHÃES ARMACOLO, Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, Brazil.; FABIANO BARBOSA ALECRIM, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências (Geoquímica), Departamento de Geoquímica, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.; RENATO DE ARAGÃO RIBEIRO RODRIGUESA, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências (Geoquímica), Departamento de Geoquímica, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil Embrapa Solos, R. Jardim Botânico, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Checking the progress of using the static chamber method for the measurement of greenhouse gases in Latin America. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Carbon Management, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1995503 |
|
Descripción física : |
Aragão |
|
ISSN : |
1758-3004 |
|
DOI : |
10.1080/17583004.2021.1995503 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Published online: 27 Oct 2021.
Correspondence author: T Renato de Aragão Ribeiro Rodrigues, e-mail: renato.rodrigues@embrapa.br
Additional information: The authors thank the scholarship supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA) through their CLIFF-GRADS programme to FFGDL, and individual grants: CNPq N° 02/2020, process number 308444/2020-5 to RARR and the Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio de Janeiro - FAPERJ JCNE grant number E-26/202.757/2019 to GNN. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - Manual static chamber is one of the most widespread methods for the quantification of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from agricultural systems. But there are concerns about the reliability of measurements and a necessity to assess the static chambers used in the studies performed in the countries of Latin America. Thus, this study aims to investigate the quality of the characteristics from the static chamber methodology, the confidence level of the GHG measurements, and recommend what should be improved. We conducted a systematic review of databases to identify peer-reviewed articles that used the static chamber method in Latin America. A total of 90 articles were analyzed and separated according to the publication year (2000-2008, 2009-2015, 2016-2020). We evaluated eight design and deployment chamber characteristics. The depth of base insertion and type of storage vial received the lowest scores, and the number of samples received the highest score. The description and reporting of the methodological procedures in the studies should be improved. The percentage of articles with high and medium confidence levels increased within the time, and the number of articles with low and very low confidence levels reduced. Scientists/Researchers should continue to follow the protocols, especially the most updated ones. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
|
Palabras claves : |
GHG management; Greenhouse gas management; Greenhouses gas; Methodologies; Performance measurement; Protocols and standards; South America. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03163naa a2200385 a 4500
001 1062620
005 2021-12-23
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1758-3004
024 7 $a10.1080/17583004.2021.1995503$2DOI
100 1 $aLEITE, F.F.G.D.
245 $aChecking the progress of using the static chamber method for the measurement of greenhouse gases in Latin America.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $cAragão
500 $aArticle history: Published online: 27 Oct 2021. Correspondence author: T Renato de Aragão Ribeiro Rodrigues, e-mail: renato.rodrigues@embrapa.br Additional information: The authors thank the scholarship supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA) through their CLIFF-GRADS programme to FFGDL, and individual grants: CNPq N° 02/2020, process number 308444/2020-5 to RARR and the Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio de Janeiro - FAPERJ JCNE grant number E-26/202.757/2019 to GNN.
520 $aABSTRACT - Manual static chamber is one of the most widespread methods for the quantification of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from agricultural systems. But there are concerns about the reliability of measurements and a necessity to assess the static chambers used in the studies performed in the countries of Latin America. Thus, this study aims to investigate the quality of the characteristics from the static chamber methodology, the confidence level of the GHG measurements, and recommend what should be improved. We conducted a systematic review of databases to identify peer-reviewed articles that used the static chamber method in Latin America. A total of 90 articles were analyzed and separated according to the publication year (2000-2008, 2009-2015, 2016-2020). We evaluated eight design and deployment chamber characteristics. The depth of base insertion and type of storage vial received the lowest scores, and the number of samples received the highest score. The description and reporting of the methodological procedures in the studies should be improved. The percentage of articles with high and medium confidence levels increased within the time, and the number of articles with low and very low confidence levels reduced. Scientists/Researchers should continue to follow the protocols, especially the most updated ones. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
653 $aGHG management
653 $aGreenhouse gas management
653 $aGreenhouses gas
653 $aMethodologies
653 $aPerformance measurement
653 $aProtocols and standards
653 $aSouth America
700 1 $aALVES, B.J.R.
700 1 $aNÓBREGA, G.N.
700 1 $aCORDEIRO, R.C.
700 1 $aCESÁRIO, F.V.
700 1 $aCAMBARERI, G.S.
700 1 $aFAVERIN, C.
700 1 $aDA SILVEIRA, J.G.
700 1 $aCIGANDA, V.
700 1 $aARMACOLO, N.M.
700 1 $aALECRIM, F.B.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, R.D.A.R.
773 $tCarbon Management, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1995503
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
