| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
21/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
MULVANEY, F.J.; MORRIS, S.T.; KENYON, P.R.; MOREL, P.C.H.; WEST, D.M.; VIÑOLES, C.; GLOVER, K.M.M. |
|
Afiliación : |
CAROLINA VIÑOLES GIL, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Comparison between the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes following a progesterone-based oestrus synchronization protocol. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2013 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2013, v.56, no.4, p. 288-296. |
|
Serie : |
0028-8233 |
|
DOI : |
10.1080/00288233.2013.842176 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 27 May 2013 // Accepted 5 September 2013. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Two experiments were conducted to compare the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes. All ewes were synchronized by an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device and bred together over a 5-day period. In Experiment 1, of those joined with the ram, more mature ewes ovulated (99% vs 68%; P < 0.05) with a higher ovulation rate (1.82 vs 1.14; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. Mature ewes had a higher pregnancy rate (98% vs 47%; P < 0.05) and lower early pregnancy loss (13% vs 41%; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. In Experiment 2, the ovulation rate (1.84 vs 1.44; P < 0.05) and pregnancy rate (86% vs 7%; P < 0.05) was higher in mature ewes compared with ewe hoggets. Combined, these studies help to quantify the difference in reproductive performance during breeding and pregnancy between ewe hoggets and mature ewes, and help to direct further research.
© 2013 The Royal Society of New Zealand. |
|
Thesagro : |
CORDEROS; REPRODUCCION ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L53 Fisiología Animal - Reproducción |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01779naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1051218
005 2019-09-25
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1080/00288233.2013.842176$2DOI
100 1 $aMULVANEY, F.J.
245 $aComparison between the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes following a progesterone-based oestrus synchronization protocol.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
490 $a0028-8233
500 $aArticle history: Received 27 May 2013 // Accepted 5 September 2013.
520 $aABSTRACT. Two experiments were conducted to compare the reproductive performance of ewe hoggets and mature ewes. All ewes were synchronized by an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device and bred together over a 5-day period. In Experiment 1, of those joined with the ram, more mature ewes ovulated (99% vs 68%; P < 0.05) with a higher ovulation rate (1.82 vs 1.14; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. Mature ewes had a higher pregnancy rate (98% vs 47%; P < 0.05) and lower early pregnancy loss (13% vs 41%; P < 0.05) than ewe hoggets. In Experiment 2, the ovulation rate (1.84 vs 1.44; P < 0.05) and pregnancy rate (86% vs 7%; P < 0.05) was higher in mature ewes compared with ewe hoggets. Combined, these studies help to quantify the difference in reproductive performance during breeding and pregnancy between ewe hoggets and mature ewes, and help to direct further research. © 2013 The Royal Society of New Zealand.
650 $aCORDEROS
650 $aREPRODUCCION ANIMAL
700 1 $aMORRIS, S.T.
700 1 $aKENYON, P.R.
700 1 $aMOREL, P.C.H.
700 1 $aWEST, D.M.
700 1 $aVIÑOLES, C.
700 1 $aGLOVER, K.M.M.
773 $tNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2013$gv.56, no.4, p. 288-296.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
| 1. |  | GARCÍA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MILLER, S.; TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D. Accuracy of indirect predictions for large datasets based on prediction error covariance of SNP effects from single-step GBLUP. [abstract 22]. Issue Section: Animal Breeding and Genetics. Journal of Animal Science, 2020, Volume 98, Issue Supplement 4, Pages 6-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa278.012 Article history: 30 November 2020.
ASAS Annual 2020 Meeting Abstracts.| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 2. | | LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MILLER, S.; MOSER, D.; MISZTAL, I. Single-step genomic BLUP for national beef cattle evaluation in US: from initial developments to final implementation. Volume Species - Bovine (beef) 1, 495. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018.| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 3. | | JIBRIN, M.O.; ANUJ SHARMA; MAVIAN, C. N.; TIMILSINA, S.; KAUR, A.; IRUEGAS-BOCARDO, F.; POTNIS, N.; MINSAVAGE, G. V.; COUTINHO, T. A.; CRESWELL, T. C.; EGEL, D. S.; FRANCIS, D. M.; KEBEDE, M.; MILLER, S. A.; MONTELONGO, M. J.; NIKOLAEVA, E.; PIANZZOLA, M. J.; PRUVOST, O.; QUEZADO-DUVAL, A. M.; RUHL, G. E.; SHUTT, V. M.; MAYNARD, E.; MAESO, D.; SIRI, M. I.; TRUEMAN, CH. L.; SALEMI, M.; VALLAD, G. E.; ROBERTS, P. D.; JONES, J. B.; GOSS, E. M. Phylodynamic insights into global emergence and diversification of the tomato pathogen Xanthomonas hortorum pv. gardneri. Research article. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions (MPMI), 2024, volume 37, issue 10, pp. 712-720. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-04-24-0035-R -- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Accepted 28 June 28 2024, Online 25 September 2024, Print October 2024. -- Corresponding author: E. M. Goss; emgoss@u?.edu . -- Funding: This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture National...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
