|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
02/12/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
ARBOLEYA, J.; RESTAINO, E. |
Afiliación : |
JORGE EDUARDO ARBOLEYA DUFOUR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ERNESTO ANGEL RESTAINO GALUP, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Agricultural extension models in South America: A description of systems in use in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Horttechnology, 2004, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 14-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.14.1.0014 |
ISSN : |
1063-0198 (print) / 1943-7714 (online) |
DOI : |
10.21273/HORTTECH.14.1.0014 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Online Publication Date: Jan 2004. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Information is presented about the linkages and relationships between the research and the transfer of technology-extension systems established within the countries that compose the Common Market of the South [Mercado Común del Sur (MERCOSUR)]. A brief description about the history of agricultural extension in each country is included along with descriptions of the major changes that have occurred within the last 10 years. This analysis allows a general comparison among the different extension approaches, and in particular regarding the institutional development for the system in the four countries of MERCOSUR. |
Palabras claves : |
Farmer linkages; Research systems; Technology transfer. |
Thesagro : |
EXTENSIÓN; MERCOSUR. |
Asunto categoría : |
C20 Extensión |
Marc : |
LEADER 01461naa a2200229 a 4500 001 1007817 005 2019-12-02 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1063-0198 (print) / 1943-7714 (online) 024 7 $a10.21273/HORTTECH.14.1.0014$2DOI 100 1 $aARBOLEYA, J. 245 $aAgricultural extension models in South America$bA description of systems in use in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2004 500 $aArticle history: Online Publication Date: Jan 2004. 520 $aABSTRACT. Information is presented about the linkages and relationships between the research and the transfer of technology-extension systems established within the countries that compose the Common Market of the South [Mercado Común del Sur (MERCOSUR)]. A brief description about the history of agricultural extension in each country is included along with descriptions of the major changes that have occurred within the last 10 years. This analysis allows a general comparison among the different extension approaches, and in particular regarding the institutional development for the system in the four countries of MERCOSUR. 650 $aEXTENSIÓN 650 $aMERCOSUR 653 $aFarmer linkages 653 $aResearch systems 653 $aTechnology transfer 700 1 $aRESTAINO, E. 773 $tHorttechnology, 2004, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 14-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.14.1.0014
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
07/10/2024 |
Actualizado : |
07/10/2024 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CAFFERA, M.; VÁSQUEZ LAVIN, F.; BARRIENTOS, M.; RODRÍGUEZ ANZA, D.; CARRASCO-LETELIER, L. |
Afiliación : |
MARCELO CAFFERA, Universidad de Montevideo, Montevideo,Uruguay; FELIPE VÁSQUEZ LAVÍN, Universidad del Desarrollo, Concepción, Santiago, Chile; Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Santiago, Chile; Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2), Santiago, Chile; MANUEL BARRIENTOS, Business School, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile; DANIEL RODRÍGUEZ ANZA, Ministerio de Ambiente, República Oriental del Uruguay, Uruguay; LEONIDAS CARRASCO-LETELIER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
The implicit market price of soil erosion: an estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers. |
Complemento del título : |
Original article. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultural Economics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12857 -- [Early View]. |
ISSN : |
0169-5151; e-ISSN: 1574-0862 |
DOI : |
10.1111/agec.12857 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted 13 May 2024, Revised 9 March 2024, Received9 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Marcelo Caffera, Universidad de
Montevideo, Prudencio de Pena 2544, Montevideo, Uruguay. Email: marcaffera@um.edu.uy -- Funding: Latin American and Caribbean Environmental Economics Program, Grant/Award Number: IDEA-018/2017; Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación, Grant/Award Number:
POS_NAC_2015_1_110233. -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014.Aunique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per-hectare price of agricultural land (P-value: .012, 95% CI: -.0042, -.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is
$.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial-temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust.
© 2024 International Association of Agricultural Economists. |
Palabras claves : |
ÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA; Farmland values; Soil erosion; Spatial spillovers; Spatio-temporal hedonic model; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
Marc : |
LEADER 02439naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1064855 005 2024-10-07 008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0169-5151; e-ISSN: 1574-0862 024 7 $a10.1111/agec.12857$2DOI 100 1 $aCAFFERA, M. 245 $aThe implicit market price of soil erosion$ban estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2024 500 $aArticle history: Accepted 13 May 2024, Revised 9 March 2024, Received9 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Marcelo Caffera, Universidad de Montevideo, Prudencio de Pena 2544, Montevideo, Uruguay. Email: marcaffera@um.edu.uy -- Funding: Latin American and Caribbean Environmental Economics Program, Grant/Award Number: IDEA-018/2017; Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación, Grant/Award Number: POS_NAC_2015_1_110233. -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014.Aunique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per-hectare price of agricultural land (P-value: .012, 95% CI: -.0042, -.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is $.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial-temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust. © 2024 International Association of Agricultural Economists. 653 $aÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA 653 $aFarmland values 653 $aSoil erosion 653 $aSpatial spillovers 653 $aSpatio-temporal hedonic model 653 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aVÁSQUEZ LAVIN, F. 700 1 $aBARRIENTOS, M. 700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ ANZA, D. 700 1 $aCARRASCO-LETELIER, L. 773 $tAgricultural Economics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12857 -- [Early View].
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|