| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
| 2. |  | ALVEZ, A.; GUILLEN, S.; SEQUEIRA, M.; MEIKLE, A.; VIÑOLES, C. Sub-fertility in beef cattle: follicle dynamics and progesterone concentration during the estrus cycle. [Resumen de poster]. ln: Encuentro de Investigadores de la Región Noreste: Cerro Largo-Rivera-Tacuarembó, 1., 12 de agosto de 2016, Campus Interinstitucional de Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó. Libro de Resúmenes. Tacuarembó: UDELAR; INIA, 2016. p. 44 Modalidad: poster.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
|    |
| 3. | | ALVEZ, A.; GUILLEN, S.; SEQUEIRA, M.; MEIKLE, A.; VIÑOLES, C. Sub-fertility in beef cattle: follicle dynamics and progesterone concentrations during the estrus cycle In: Juengel, J.L.; Miyamoto, A.; Price, C.; Reynolds, L.P.; Smith, M.F.; Webb, R.; eds. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Reproduction in Dometic Ruminants, 9., Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan, Agosto 2014 621 p.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 4. | | ARCE, O.; ROBINET, H.A.; MANSILLA DE ANDRADA, N.; DÍAZ, B.E.; GUILLÉN, S. Determinación de pérdidas en cultivo de soja (Glicyne max L. Merr.) por competencia con saetilla (Bidens subalternans D.C. y Bidens pilosa L.) en el noreste de la Provincia de Tucumán, Argentina In: ASOCIACIÓN LATINOAMERICANA DE MALEZAS. CONGRESO LATINOAMERICANO DE MALEZAS, 12. 21-23 MARZO 1995, MONTEVIDEO (URY). RÍOS, A.; FERNÁNDEZ, G. (EDS.). Conferencias y trabajos. Montevideo: INIA, 1995. p. 216-220 (INIA Serie Técnica ; 56) Congreso declarado de interés nacional (decreto del Poder Ejecutivo octubre/1994)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 5. | | DE ANDRADA, N.; ROBINET, H.; ARCE, O.; DÍAZ, B.; GUILLEN, S.; MANSILLA, N.; GALLO, E. Relevamiento y determinación de la distribución de malezas frecuentes en la zona sojera del noreste de Tucumán, República Argentina In: ASOCIACIÓN LATINOAMERICANA DE MALEZAS. CONGRESO LATINOAMERICANO DE MALEZAS, 12. 21-23 MARZO 1995, MONTEVIDEO (URY). RÍOS, A.; FERNÁNDEZ, G. (EDS.). Conferencias y trabajos. Montevideo: INIA, 1995. p. 50-60 (INIA Serie Técnica ; 56) Congreso declarado de interés nacional (decreto del Poder Ejecutivo octubre/1994)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
26/10/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/09/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CLARIGET, J.M.; LA MANNA, A.; LUZARDO, S.; PEREZ, E.; FERNANDEZ, E.; ROIG, G.; AZNÁREZ, V.; BANCHERO, G. |
|
Afiliación : |
JUAN MANUEL CLARIGET BRIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALEJANDRO FRANCISCO LA MANNA ALONSO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; EDUARDO FABIAN PEREZ ARRUTTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GONZALO ROIG, MARFRIG Group, Río Negro,Uruguay; VALENTÍN AZNÁREZ, MARFRIG Group, Río Negro, Uruguay; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Eucalyptus bark: A new source of fiber from the wood pulp industry for feeding to beef feedlot cattle. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Applied Animal Science, Volume 36, Issue 5, October 2020, Pages 592-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2020-02002 |
|
DOI : |
10.15232/aas.2020-02002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 28 February 2020, Accepted 26 June 2020, Available online 28 September 2020. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This research was supported by the Instituto Nacional
de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay (grant numbers N-19407, 2016) and the MARFRIG Group industry. The authors wish to thank to the agricultural technicians Christian Solari and Gabriel Fernandez for their.
cooperation. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: Objective: Our objectives were to compare the effects of feeding eucalyptus bark or eucalyptus wood chips, both by-products from the pulp industry, on voluntary feed intake, animal performance, and physiological variables of heifers finished on high-concentrate diets. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight British-breed heifers (Angus, Hereford, and their crosses) that were 22 to 24 mo of age and had an initial BW of 355 ± 8 kg were used. Four heifers were allocated to each of the 12 pens (experimental units). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 2 treatments and 6 replications each. The 2 different fiber sources (wood chips or bark) were included in the fattening diet in the same proportion (8.9% DM basis). The rest of the ingredients in the diet were the same. The final diet was offered 3 times per day, and heifers were fed for 84 d. Results and Discussion: Fiber source (wood chips vs. bark) did not affect ADG or G:F (P > 0.10). However, DMI (P < 0.01), DP (P = 0.04), and hot carcass weight (P = 0.06) were greater in heifers fed with bark compared with those fed with wood chips. Heifers from the bark treatment spent less time (P = 0.02) chewing than heifers from the wood chips treatment. Implications and Applications: In conclusion, bark could be used as a source of fiber for finishing cattle in high-concentrate diets at the same levels as wood chips. This finding is relevant for the feedlot industry because eucalyptus bark has no industrial uses and would represent a cheaper fiber source than wood chips. MenosABSTRACT: Objective: Our objectives were to compare the effects of feeding eucalyptus bark or eucalyptus wood chips, both by-products from the pulp industry, on voluntary feed intake, animal performance, and physiological variables of heifers finished on high-concentrate diets. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight British-breed heifers (Angus, Hereford, and their crosses) that were 22 to 24 mo of age and had an initial BW of 355 ± 8 kg were used. Four heifers were allocated to each of the 12 pens (experimental units). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 2 treatments and 6 replications each. The 2 different fiber sources (wood chips or bark) were included in the fattening diet in the same proportion (8.9% DM basis). The rest of the ingredients in the diet were the same. The final diet was offered 3 times per day, and heifers were fed for 84 d. Results and Discussion: Fiber source (wood chips vs. bark) did not affect ADG or G:F (P > 0.10). However, DMI (P < 0.01), DP (P = 0.04), and hot carcass weight (P = 0.06) were greater in heifers fed with bark compared with those fed with wood chips. Heifers from the bark treatment spent less time (P = 0.02) chewing than heifers from the wood chips treatment. Implications and Applications: In conclusion, bark could be used as a source of fiber for finishing cattle in high-concentrate diets at the same levels as wood chips. This finding is relevant for the feedlot industry because eucalyptus bark has no industrial use... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF; EUCALYPTUS; FATTENING; FEED EFFICIENCY; ROUGHAGE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02820naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1061427
005 2020-09-28
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.15232/aas.2020-02002$2DOI
100 1 $aCLARIGET, J.M.
245 $aEucalyptus bark$bA new source of fiber from the wood pulp industry for feeding to beef feedlot cattle.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 28 February 2020, Accepted 26 June 2020, Available online 28 September 2020. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This research was supported by the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay (grant numbers N-19407, 2016) and the MARFRIG Group industry. The authors wish to thank to the agricultural technicians Christian Solari and Gabriel Fernandez for their. cooperation.
520 $aABSTRACT: Objective: Our objectives were to compare the effects of feeding eucalyptus bark or eucalyptus wood chips, both by-products from the pulp industry, on voluntary feed intake, animal performance, and physiological variables of heifers finished on high-concentrate diets. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight British-breed heifers (Angus, Hereford, and their crosses) that were 22 to 24 mo of age and had an initial BW of 355 ± 8 kg were used. Four heifers were allocated to each of the 12 pens (experimental units). The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 2 treatments and 6 replications each. The 2 different fiber sources (wood chips or bark) were included in the fattening diet in the same proportion (8.9% DM basis). The rest of the ingredients in the diet were the same. The final diet was offered 3 times per day, and heifers were fed for 84 d. Results and Discussion: Fiber source (wood chips vs. bark) did not affect ADG or G:F (P > 0.10). However, DMI (P < 0.01), DP (P = 0.04), and hot carcass weight (P = 0.06) were greater in heifers fed with bark compared with those fed with wood chips. Heifers from the bark treatment spent less time (P = 0.02) chewing than heifers from the wood chips treatment. Implications and Applications: In conclusion, bark could be used as a source of fiber for finishing cattle in high-concentrate diets at the same levels as wood chips. This finding is relevant for the feedlot industry because eucalyptus bark has no industrial uses and would represent a cheaper fiber source than wood chips.
653 $aBEEF
653 $aEUCALYPTUS
653 $aFATTENING
653 $aFEED EFFICIENCY
653 $aROUGHAGE
700 1 $aLA MANNA, A.
700 1 $aLUZARDO, S.
700 1 $aPEREZ, E.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E.
700 1 $aROIG, G.
700 1 $aAZNÁREZ, V.
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
773 $tApplied Animal Science, Volume 36, Issue 5, October 2020, Pages 592-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2020-02002
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
