| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
| 1. |  | Vassallo, M. Aportes sobre el sistema de transferencia de tecnología agraria del Uruguay ln: Gastal, E. ; Puignau, J.P. ; Tonina, T. (eds.). Transferencia de tecnología agropecuaria : enfoques de hoy y perspectivas para el futuro. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA/BID/PROCISUR, 1989. p245-253 (IICA-PROCISUR. Diálogo, 27) Contiene : Trabajos presentados al Seminario Taller sobre Transferencia de Tecnología, 1988 dic 14-16 : Colonia| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|   |
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
01/12/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
21/05/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
PARODI, P.; CORBELLINI, L.G.; LEOTTI, V.B.; RIVERO, R.; MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F.; VENZAL, J.M.; ARMÚA-FERNÁNDEZ, M.T. |
|
Afiliación : |
PABLO ANDRÉS PARODI TEXEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUIS G. CORBELLINI, Laboratório de Epidemiología Veterinária, Facultad de Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; VANESSA B. LEOTTI, Departamento de Estatística, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; RODOLFO RIVERO, Laboratorio Regional Noroeste “Miguel C. Rubino”, División de Laboratorios Veterinarios “Miguel C. Rubino”, Paysandú, Uruguay; MÓNICA CECILIA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ M. VENZAL, Laboratorio de Vectores y enfermedades transmitidas, Facultad de Veterinaria, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay; MARÍA T. ARMÚA-FERNÁNDEZ, Laboratorio de Vectores y enfermedades transmitidas, Facultad de Veterinaria, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Validation of a multiplex PCR assay to detect Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale in cattle in Uruguay in the absence of a gold standard test. (Full Scientific Report) |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 73-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638720975742 |
|
DOI : |
10.1177/1040638720975742 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Article first published online: November 30, 2020; Issue published: January 1, 2021. Acknowledgments: We thank Dra. María Angélica Solari (DILAVE-Montevideo), and the veterinarians and farmers who submitted samples. Corresponding author: Pablo Parodi: pabloparodi7@gmail.com |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: Detection of bovine Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale is based on the reading of Giemsa-stained blood or organ smears, which can have low sensitivity. Our aim was to improve the detection of bovine Babesia spp. and A. marginale by validating a multiplex PCR (mPCR). We used 466 samples of blood and/or organs of animals with signs and presumptive autopsy findings of babesiosis or anaplasmosis. The primers in our mPCR amplified the rap-1a gene region of Babesia bovis and B. bigemina, and the msp-5 region of A. marginale. We used a Bayesian model with a non-informative priori distribution for the prevalence estimate and informative priori distribution for estimation of sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity and specificity for smear detection of Babesia spp. were 68.6% and 99.1%, and for A. marginale 85.6% and 98.8%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for mPCR detection for Babesia spp. were 94.2% and 97.1%, and for A. marginale 95.2% and 92.7%, respectively. Our mPCR had good accuracy in detecting Babesia spp. and A. marginale, and would be a reliable test for veterinarians to choose the correct treatment for each agent. |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANAPLASMA MARGINALE; BABESIA SPP; CATTLE; ENFERMEDADES DE LOS ANIMALES; MULTIPLEX PCR; PLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY; TICK-BORNE DISEASES. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
E16 Enfermedades de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02587naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1061695
005 2021-05-21
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1177/1040638720975742$2DOI
100 1 $aPARODI, P.
245 $aValidation of a multiplex PCR assay to detect Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale in cattle in Uruguay in the absence of a gold standard test. (Full Scientific Report)$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Article first published online: November 30, 2020; Issue published: January 1, 2021. Acknowledgments: We thank Dra. María Angélica Solari (DILAVE-Montevideo), and the veterinarians and farmers who submitted samples. Corresponding author: Pablo Parodi: pabloparodi7@gmail.com
520 $aAbstract: Detection of bovine Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale is based on the reading of Giemsa-stained blood or organ smears, which can have low sensitivity. Our aim was to improve the detection of bovine Babesia spp. and A. marginale by validating a multiplex PCR (mPCR). We used 466 samples of blood and/or organs of animals with signs and presumptive autopsy findings of babesiosis or anaplasmosis. The primers in our mPCR amplified the rap-1a gene region of Babesia bovis and B. bigemina, and the msp-5 region of A. marginale. We used a Bayesian model with a non-informative priori distribution for the prevalence estimate and informative priori distribution for estimation of sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity and specificity for smear detection of Babesia spp. were 68.6% and 99.1%, and for A. marginale 85.6% and 98.8%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for mPCR detection for Babesia spp. were 94.2% and 97.1%, and for A. marginale 95.2% and 92.7%, respectively. Our mPCR had good accuracy in detecting Babesia spp. and A. marginale, and would be a reliable test for veterinarians to choose the correct treatment for each agent.
653 $aANAPLASMA MARGINALE
653 $aBABESIA SPP
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aENFERMEDADES DE LOS ANIMALES
653 $aMULTIPLEX PCR
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aSENSITIVITY
653 $aSPECIFICITY
653 $aTICK-BORNE DISEASES
700 1 $aCORBELLINI, L.G.
700 1 $aLEOTTI, V.B.
700 1 $aRIVERO, R.
700 1 $aMIRABALLES, C.
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
700 1 $aVENZAL, J.M.
700 1 $aARMÚA-FERNÁNDEZ, M.T.
773 $tJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 73-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638720975742
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
