| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | BELANCHE, A.; HRISTOV, A.; VAN LINGEN, H.; DENMAN, S. E.; KEBREAB, E.; SCHWARM, A.; KREUZER, M.; NIU, M.; EUGÈNE, M.; NIDERKORN, V.; MARTIN, C.; ARCHIMÈDE, H.; MCGEE, M.; REYNOLDS, C. K.; CROMPTON, L. A.; BAYAT, A. R.; YU, Z.; BANNINK, A.; DIJKSTRA, J.; CHAVES, A. V.; CLARK, H.; MUETZEL, S.; LIND, V.; MOORBY, J. M.; ROOKE, J. A.; AUBRY, A.; ANTEZANA, W.; WANG, M.; HEGARTY, R.; HUTTON O. V.; HILL, J.; VERCOE, P. E.; SAVIAN, J.V.; ABDALLA, A. L.; SOLTAN, Y. A.; GOMES MONTEIRO, A. L.; KU-VERA, J. C.; JAURENA, G.; GÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A.; MAYORGA, O. L.; CONGIO, G. F. S.; YÁÑEZ-RUIZ, D. R. Prediction of enteric methane emissions by sheep using an intercontinental database. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 January 2023, Volume 384, 135523. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135523 Article history: Received 24 May 2022; Received in revised form 11 November 2022; Accepted 3 December 2022; Available online 9 December 2022.
Corresponding author: Belanche, A.; Department of Animal Production and Food Sciences, IA2,...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
02/12/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
02/12/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
|
Autor : |
FARIAS, G.D.; BATISTA DEBEUX JR, J.C.; SAVIAN, J.V.; PACHERO DUARTE, L.; POSSELT MARTINS, A.; TIECHER, T.; AQUINO ALVES, L.; CARVALHO, P.C. DE FACCIO; BREMM, C. |
|
Afiliación : |
GUSTAVO DUARTE FARIAS, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Integrated Crop-Livestock System Research Group (GPSIPA), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.; JOSE CARLOS BATISTA DUBEUX JR., University of Florida ? North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL, USA.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LÓREN PACHECO DUARTE, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Integrated Crop-Livestock System Research Group (GPSIPA), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; AMANDA POSSELT MARTINS, Department of Soil Science, Interdisciplinary Research Group on Environmental Biogeochemistry (IRGEB), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; TALES TIECHER, Department of Soil Science, Interdisciplinary Research Group on Environmental Biogeochemistry (IRGEB), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.; LUCAS AQUINO ALVES, Department of Soil Science, Interdisciplinary Research Group on Environmental Biogeochemistry (IRGEB), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO; CAROLINA, BREMM, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Integrated Crop-Livestock System Research Group (GPSIPA), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. |
|
Título : |
Integrated crop-livestock system with system fertilization approach improves food production and resource-use efficiency in agricultural lands. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development volume, 2020. 40, art. 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00643-2 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s13593-020-00643-2 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted: 4 October 2020. Published: 27 October 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
Integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) can be an alternative to increase the productivity of agroecosystems by enhancing nutrient cycling via grazing animals. Despite the holistic approach that bears the designing of ICLS, fertilization practices are proceeded in a conventional crop basis, disregarding nutrient fluxes at the appropriate spatial and temporal dynamics. We argue that fertilization practices in ICLS must follow the same integrated approach. To test this, we compared a conventional crop fertilization strategy versus a system fertilization approach applied to two production systems being a conventional cropping system and ICLS. The conventional cropping system consisted of a soybean crop succeeded by a non-grazed Italian ryegrass cover crop. The ICLS model consisted of a soybean-Italian ryegrass rotation grazed by sheep. In the conventional crop fertilization strategy phosphorus and potassium were applied at soybean sowing and nitrogen at the Italian ryegrass establishment. The system fertilization consisted of the application of all nutrients during the Italian ryegrass establishment. Accordingly, treatments were fertilization strategies in a factorial framework with production systems randomly distributed in a complete block design with four replicates. Results indicated for the first time greater daily herbage accumulation rate (24%; P < 0.01) and total herbage production (18%; P < 0.05) in the system fertilization compared with conventional crop fertilization. Consequently, system fertilization allowed for greater stocking rates in the pasture phase (17%; P < 0.05). The ICLS presented greater equivalent soybean yield (P < 0.001), energy production (P < 0.01), and system productivity (P < 0.05) compared with the cropping system, regardless of fertilization strategies. Soybean yield was not affected by fertilization strategies or grazing. In conclusion, the adoption of system fertilization strategy and crop-livestock integration enhance the production without jeopardizing soybean grain yields, so that land use is optimized by a greater energy production per unit of nutrient applied. MenosIntegrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) can be an alternative to increase the productivity of agroecosystems by enhancing nutrient cycling via grazing animals. Despite the holistic approach that bears the designing of ICLS, fertilization practices are proceeded in a conventional crop basis, disregarding nutrient fluxes at the appropriate spatial and temporal dynamics. We argue that fertilization practices in ICLS must follow the same integrated approach. To test this, we compared a conventional crop fertilization strategy versus a system fertilization approach applied to two production systems being a conventional cropping system and ICLS. The conventional cropping system consisted of a soybean crop succeeded by a non-grazed Italian ryegrass cover crop. The ICLS model consisted of a soybean-Italian ryegrass rotation grazed by sheep. In the conventional crop fertilization strategy phosphorus and potassium were applied at soybean sowing and nitrogen at the Italian ryegrass establishment. The system fertilization consisted of the application of all nutrients during the Italian ryegrass establishment. Accordingly, treatments were fertilization strategies in a factorial framework with production systems randomly distributed in a complete block design with four replicates. Results indicated for the first time greater daily herbage accumulation rate (24%; P < 0.01) and total herbage production (18%; P < 0.05) in the system fertilization compared with conventional crop fertilizatio... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CROP FERTILIZATION; CROPPING SYSTEMS; GRAZING; MIXED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; NUTRIENT CYCLING; SOYBEAN. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03231naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1061534
005 2020-12-02
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s13593-020-00643-2$2DOI
100 1 $aFARIAS, G.D.
245 $aIntegrated crop-livestock system with system fertilization approach improves food production and resource-use efficiency in agricultural lands.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Accepted: 4 October 2020. Published: 27 October 2020.
520 $aIntegrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS) can be an alternative to increase the productivity of agroecosystems by enhancing nutrient cycling via grazing animals. Despite the holistic approach that bears the designing of ICLS, fertilization practices are proceeded in a conventional crop basis, disregarding nutrient fluxes at the appropriate spatial and temporal dynamics. We argue that fertilization practices in ICLS must follow the same integrated approach. To test this, we compared a conventional crop fertilization strategy versus a system fertilization approach applied to two production systems being a conventional cropping system and ICLS. The conventional cropping system consisted of a soybean crop succeeded by a non-grazed Italian ryegrass cover crop. The ICLS model consisted of a soybean-Italian ryegrass rotation grazed by sheep. In the conventional crop fertilization strategy phosphorus and potassium were applied at soybean sowing and nitrogen at the Italian ryegrass establishment. The system fertilization consisted of the application of all nutrients during the Italian ryegrass establishment. Accordingly, treatments were fertilization strategies in a factorial framework with production systems randomly distributed in a complete block design with four replicates. Results indicated for the first time greater daily herbage accumulation rate (24%; P < 0.01) and total herbage production (18%; P < 0.05) in the system fertilization compared with conventional crop fertilization. Consequently, system fertilization allowed for greater stocking rates in the pasture phase (17%; P < 0.05). The ICLS presented greater equivalent soybean yield (P < 0.001), energy production (P < 0.01), and system productivity (P < 0.05) compared with the cropping system, regardless of fertilization strategies. Soybean yield was not affected by fertilization strategies or grazing. In conclusion, the adoption of system fertilization strategy and crop-livestock integration enhance the production without jeopardizing soybean grain yields, so that land use is optimized by a greater energy production per unit of nutrient applied.
653 $aCROP FERTILIZATION
653 $aCROPPING SYSTEMS
653 $aGRAZING
653 $aMIXED CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS
653 $aNUTRIENT CYCLING
653 $aSOYBEAN
700 1 $aBATISTA DEBEUX JR, J.C.
700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V.
700 1 $aPACHERO DUARTE, L.
700 1 $aPOSSELT MARTINS, A.
700 1 $aTIECHER, T.
700 1 $aAQUINO ALVES, L.
700 1 $aCARVALHO, P.C. DE FACCIO
700 1 $aBREMM, C.
773 $tAgronomy for Sustainable Development volume, 2020. 40, art. 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00643-2
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
