| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
| 3. |  | CONDE, P.; BORSANI, J.; PONCE DE LEÓN, I. Olive-tree physiological response to biotic and abiotic stress fruit yield, oil quality and tolerance to Anthracnose:Doctoral thesis abstract. [Respuesta fisiológica del olivo a estrés biótico y abiótico: rendimiento, calidad del aceite y tolerancia a antracnosis:Resumen de tesis doctoral.]. Abstracts. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2024, Vol.28 (Supplement theses), e1474. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.28.1474 -- OPEN ACCESS. Doctorando/a: Ana Paula Conde Innamorato. - Director/a tesis: Julio Omar Borsani Cambón, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Uruguay. - Codirector/a tesis: Inés Ponce de León, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/03/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
16/03/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
GALLEGO, F.; PARUELO, J.; BAEZA, S.; ALTESOR, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
FEDERICO GALLEGO, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Mdeo, Uruguay; Depto. Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía and IFEVA, UBA and CONICET, Bs.As., Argentina; SANTIAGO BAEZA, Departamento de Sistemas Ambientales, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; ALICE ALTESOR, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Distinct ecosystem types respond differentially to grazing exclosure. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Austral Ecology, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12870 |
|
ISSN : |
1442-9985 |
|
DOI : |
10.1111/aec.12870 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted for publication January 2020 / First published: 28 February 2020.
Corresponding author: Gallego, F., email:fgallego@fcien.edu.uy |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Here, we evaluate the ecosystem functioning and the ecosystems services supply of different vegetation types (grasslands, shrublands and woodlands) under contrasting management regimes by comparing a protected area with the surrounding landscape, which has been subjected to human disturbance in the Eastern Hills of Uruguay. We propose, based on functional attributes and vegetation physiognomy, a State and Transition Model for the dynamics of the grassland?woodland mosaic. We used remote sensing techniques to: (i) develop a land-cover map of the study area based on supervised Landsat imagery classification, and (ii) compare attributes of the ecosystem functioning (productivity and seasonality) and service supply derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) images provided by the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor. The land-cover map showed that grasslands and shrublands were the most extensive land covers in the study area. These vegetation types presented higher productivity, seasonality and ecosystem service supply, outside the protected area than inside it. On the other hand, woodlands showed higher productivity, ecosystem service supply and lower seasonality inside the protected area than outside of it. Two axes represented the grassland?woodland mosaic dynamic: (i) the mean annual and (ii) the intra-annual coefficient of variation of the NDVI. Our results highlight that conservation of grasslands, shrublands and woodlands require different management strategies based on particular disturbance regimes like moderate grazing and controlled burns. Moderate disturbances may help to preserve ecosystem services provisioning in grasslands and shrublands. On the contrary, woodland conservation requires a more rigorous regime of protection against disturbances. © 2020 Ecological Society of Australia MenosABSTRACT.
Here, we evaluate the ecosystem functioning and the ecosystems services supply of different vegetation types (grasslands, shrublands and woodlands) under contrasting management regimes by comparing a protected area with the surrounding landscape, which has been subjected to human disturbance in the Eastern Hills of Uruguay. We propose, based on functional attributes and vegetation physiognomy, a State and Transition Model for the dynamics of the grassland?woodland mosaic. We used remote sensing techniques to: (i) develop a land-cover map of the study area based on supervised Landsat imagery classification, and (ii) compare attributes of the ecosystem functioning (productivity and seasonality) and service supply derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) images provided by the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor. The land-cover map showed that grasslands and shrublands were the most extensive land covers in the study area. These vegetation types presented higher productivity, seasonality and ecosystem service supply, outside the protected area than inside it. On the other hand, woodlands showed higher productivity, ecosystem service supply and lower seasonality inside the protected area than outside of it. Two axes represented the grassland?woodland mosaic dynamic: (i) the mean annual and (ii) the intra-annual coefficient of variation of the NDVI. Our results highlight that conservation of grasslands, shrublands and woodl... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Ecosystem services; Grassland; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Remote sensing; State and transition model; Woodland mosaic ecosystem. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02805naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1060920
005 2020-03-16
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1442-9985
024 7 $a10.1111/aec.12870$2DOI
100 1 $aGALLEGO, F.
245 $aDistinct ecosystem types respond differentially to grazing exclosure.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Accepted for publication January 2020 / First published: 28 February 2020. Corresponding author: Gallego, F., email:fgallego@fcien.edu.uy
520 $aABSTRACT. Here, we evaluate the ecosystem functioning and the ecosystems services supply of different vegetation types (grasslands, shrublands and woodlands) under contrasting management regimes by comparing a protected area with the surrounding landscape, which has been subjected to human disturbance in the Eastern Hills of Uruguay. We propose, based on functional attributes and vegetation physiognomy, a State and Transition Model for the dynamics of the grassland?woodland mosaic. We used remote sensing techniques to: (i) develop a land-cover map of the study area based on supervised Landsat imagery classification, and (ii) compare attributes of the ecosystem functioning (productivity and seasonality) and service supply derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) images provided by the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor. The land-cover map showed that grasslands and shrublands were the most extensive land covers in the study area. These vegetation types presented higher productivity, seasonality and ecosystem service supply, outside the protected area than inside it. On the other hand, woodlands showed higher productivity, ecosystem service supply and lower seasonality inside the protected area than outside of it. Two axes represented the grassland?woodland mosaic dynamic: (i) the mean annual and (ii) the intra-annual coefficient of variation of the NDVI. Our results highlight that conservation of grasslands, shrublands and woodlands require different management strategies based on particular disturbance regimes like moderate grazing and controlled burns. Moderate disturbances may help to preserve ecosystem services provisioning in grasslands and shrublands. On the contrary, woodland conservation requires a more rigorous regime of protection against disturbances. © 2020 Ecological Society of Australia
653 $aEcosystem services
653 $aGrassland
653 $aNormalized Difference Vegetation Index
653 $aRemote sensing
653 $aState and transition model
653 $aWoodland mosaic ecosystem
700 1 $aPARUELO, J.
700 1 $aBAEZA, S.
700 1 $aALTESOR, A.
773 $tAustral Ecology, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12870
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
