| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 141 | |
| 4. |  | Ceretta, S. Evaluación de cultivares de girasol ln: Jornada Técnica Cultivos de Verano, 1996 La Estanzuela, Colonia (Uruguay): INIA, 1996. p. 27-39 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 104) Participaron en esta Jornada: Programa Nacional de Cultivos de Verano y Programa Nacional de Evaluación de Cultivares INIA La Estanzuela| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|   |
| 5. | | CERETTA, S. Evaluación de cultivares de girasol. ln: Jornada Cultivos de Verano, 1997 : La Estanzuela [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1997. p.63-79. (INIA Serie de Actividades de Difusión ;138). INIA La Estanzuela| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 7. | | Ceretta, S. Evaluación de cultivares de sorgo ln: Dia de Campo Cultivos de Verano, 1991 feb : La Estanzuela [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1991. p14-19 Dia de Campo Cultivos de Verano (INIA)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 11. | | Ceretta, S. Ensayo varietal de girasol La Estanzuela : 2a epoca de siembra ln: Dia de Campo Cultivos de Verano, 1997 : La Estanzuela [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1997. p15-21 Serie Actividades de Difusión (INIA) Participaron : Programa Nacional de Cultivos de Verano [y] Programa Nacional de Evaluación de Cultivares| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 12. | | CERETTA, S. Ensayo varietal de maiz La Estanzuela: 1a. época de siembra. ln: Cultivos de verano: día de campo, 1996 La Estanzuela, Colonia (Uruguay): INIA, 1996. p. 7-14. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 88). Participaron : Programa Nacional de Cultivos de Verano [y] Programa Nacional de Evaluación de Cultivares| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|  |
| 13. | | Ceretta, S. Ensayo varietal de maiz La Estanzuela : 1a epoca de siembra ln: Dia de Campo Cultivos de Verano, 1997 : La Estanzuela [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1997. p6-14 Serie Actividades de Difusión (INIA) Participaron : Programa Nacional de Cultivos de Verano [y] Programa Nacional de Evaluación de Cultivares| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 14. | | Ceretta, S. Ensayo varietal de soja La Estanzuela : 2a epoca de siembra ln: Dia de Campo Cultivos de Verano, 1997 : La Estanzuela [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1997. p27-29 Serie Actividades de Difusión (INIA) Participaron : Programa Nacional de Cultivos de Verano [y] Programa Nacional de Evaluación de Cultivares| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 16. | | Ceretta, S. Girasol ln: Jornada Cultivos de Verano, 1991 set 11 : La Estanzuela [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1991. p19-46 Jornada de Cultivos de Verano (INIA)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 18. | | CERETTA, S. INIA está reiniciando su programa de mejoramiento genético de soja. In: MESA TECNOLÓGICA DE OLEAGINOSOS (MTO), UY. "Aumentar la producción y disminuir impactos". Verde (Montevideo), v.2, n. 11, p. 106, 2009. "La Mesa Tecnológica de Oleaginosos (MTO) se creó hace cuatro años [i.e. 2005] a partir de una iniciativa público-privada que agrupa empresas productores, industriales y comercializadoras de oleaginosos, así como instituciones de...| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 141 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
27/08/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/02/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
A review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2018, v. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398. |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control. MenosAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This pape... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANAPLAMOSIS; BABESIOSIS; CATTLE TICK; CONTROL. |
|
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02354naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1058946
005 2019-02-25
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3$2DOI
100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C.
245 $aA review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018.
520 $aAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures, variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control.
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aANAPLAMOSIS
653 $aBABESIOSIS
653 $aCATTLE TICK
653 $aCONTROL
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
773 $tExperimental and Applied Acarology, 2018$gv. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| No hay resultados para la expresión de búsqueda informada registros. |
|
|
