| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 4 | |
| 2. |  | AMARAL, G.A. DO; AZEVEDO, E. B. DE; SAVIAN, J.V.; BREMM, C.; DAVID, D.B. DE; GONDA, H.L.; BINDELLE, J.; CARVALHO, P.C.F. Purified and enriched lignin as a marker to estimate faecal output of sheep fed temperate and tropical grasses. Livestock Science, 2022, Volume 263, Article number 105011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.105011 7 p. History article: Received 9 December 2021; Received in revised form 20 April 2022; Accepted 28 June 2022; Available online1 July 2022.
Corresponding author: eduardo.azevedo@ufsm.br (E.B. Azevedo).| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 3. | | DE AZEVEDO, E.B.; SAVIAN, J.V.; DO AMARAL, G. A.; DE DAVID, D. B.; GERE, J.I.; MOURA, M.; BREMM, C.; JOCHIMS, F.; ZUBIETA, A. S.; GONDA, H. L.; BAYER, C.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P.C. Feed intake, methane yield, and efciency of utilization of energy and nitrogen by sheep fed tropical grasses. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021, volume 53, Article number 452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02928-4 Article history: Received: 10 July 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2021; Published online: 18 September 2021.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 4. | | SOUZA CONGIO, G. F. DE; BANNINK, A.; MAYORGA, MOGOLLÓN, O. L.; NICOLOV HRISTOV, A.; JAURENA, G.; GONDA, H.; GERE, J. I.; CERÓN-CUCCHI, M.E.; ORTIZ-CHURA, A.; TIERI, M.P.; HERNÁNDEZ, O.; RICCI, P.; JULIARENA, M.P.; LOMBARDI, B.; ABDALLA, A.L.; ABDALLA-FILHO, A.L.; BERNDT, A.; ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, P. P.; HENRIQUE, F. L.; GOMEZ MONTEIRO, A.L.; BORGES, L. I.; RIBEIRO-FILHO, H.M.N.; RIBEIRO PEREIRA, L.G.; RIBEIRO TOMICH, T.; MAGALHAES CAMPOS, M.; SAMARINI MACHADO, F.; MARCONDES, M. I.; ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, M. E.; SANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, L.; GALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, L.; FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. DE; ROSSETTO, J.; SAVIAN, J.V.; MAZZA RODRIGUES, P. H.; PERNA JÚNIOR, F.; MOREIRA, T.S.; MAURÍCIO, R. M.; PACHECO RODRIGUES, J.P.; CRUZ BORGES, A.L. DA C.; REIS E SILVA, R.; FERREIRA LAGE, H.; ANDRADE REIS, R.; RUGGIERI, A.C.; CARDOSO, A. DA SILVA; SILVA, S. CARNEIRO DA; BARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, M.; VALADARES-FILHO, S. DE CAMPOS; SILVA, F. A. DE SALES; ZANETTI, D.; BERCHIELLI, T.T.; DUARTE MESSANA, J.; MUÑOZ, C.; ARIZA-NIETO, C.J.; SIERRA-ALARCÓN, L.I.; GUALDRÓN-DUARTE, L.B.; MESTRA-VARGAS, L.I.; MOLINA-BOTERO, I. C.; BARAHONA-ROSALES, R.; ARANGO, J.; GAVIRIA-URIBE, X.; GIRALDO VALDERRAMA, L.A.; ROSERO-NOGUERA, J.R.; POSADA-OCHOA, S.L.; ABARCA-MONGE, SERGIO; SOTO-BLANCO, R.; KU-VERA, J.C.; JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, R.; FLORES-SANTIAGO, E. DEL J.; CASTELÁN-ORTEGA, O.A.; VÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, M.F.; BENAOUDA, M.; GÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A.; ALVARADO BOLOVICH, V.I.; DÍAZ CÉSPEDES, M.A.; ASTIGARRAGA, L. Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. v. 312, art. 127693, 13 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693 Article history: Receiived 22 December 2020; Received in revised form 24 April 2021; Accepted 25 May 2021. Available online 30 May 2021.
Latin America Methane Project Collaborators está integrada por 71 investigadores en este artículo.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 4 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/02/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/02/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
BERRUETA, C.; HEUVELINK, E.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; DOGLIOTTI, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; EP HEUVELINK, Horticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, the Netherlands; GUSTAVO GIMÉNEZ FRANQUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI MORO, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Estimation of tomato yield gaps for greenhouse in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Scientia Horticulturae, 30 April 2020, Volume 265, 109250. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 28 September 2018 / Revised 20 January 2020 / Accepted 30 January 2020 / Available online 7 February 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by earlier planting, reducing leaf pruning intensity after harvest beginning, and increasing greenhouse transmissivity by more frequent plastic cover renewal and removing roofs? shading screens and whitening.
© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.
Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Light interception; Solanum lycopersicum; TOMSIM; Yield components; Yield potentail. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02610naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1060797
005 2020-02-12
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250$2DOI
100 1 $aBERRUETA, C.
245 $aEstimation of tomato yield gaps for greenhouse in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 28 September 2018 / Revised 20 January 2020 / Accepted 30 January 2020 / Available online 7 February 2020.
520 $aABSTRACT. Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by earlier planting, reducing leaf pruning intensity after harvest beginning, and increasing greenhouse transmissivity by more frequent plastic cover renewal and removing roofs? shading screens and whitening. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
653 $aLight interception
653 $aSolanum lycopersicum
653 $aTOMSIM
653 $aYield components
653 $aYield potentail
700 1 $aHEUVELINK, E.
700 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, G.
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
773 $tScientia Horticulturae, 30 April 2020, Volume 265, 109250. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
