| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
| 1. |  | Pérez Arrarte, C.; Oliveira, P.; Panario, D.; Carballo, G.; Cespedes, C.; Crossara, A.; Di Landro, E.; Gutierrez, O.; Loureiro, L. Procesamiento digital de imagenes satelitales en la gestión de los recursos naturales : aplicaciones agronómicas ln: Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Agronómica, 6 : 1993 set 28-30 : Montevideo Trabajos presentados. Montevideo (Uruguay): Asociación de Ingenieros Agrónomos del Uruguay, 1993. pVIII.15-18| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|   |
| 2. | | OLIVEIRA, P. A. DE; RUAS, J. L.; RIET-CORREA, F.; COELHO, A. C. B.; SANTOS, B. L.; MARCOLONGO-PEREIRA, C.; SALLIS, E. S. V.; SCHILD, A. L. Doenças parasitárias em bovinos e ovinos no sul do Brasil: frequência e estimativa de perdas econômicas. (Parasitic diseases of cattle and sheep in southern Brazil: frequency and economic losses estimate. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Brasília, DF v. 37, n. 8, p. 797-801, ago. 2017. Article History: Recebido em 6 de agosto de 2015.//Aceptado 13 de set 2016.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|  |
| 3. | | BERTON, MP.; DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, R.M.; PERIPOLLI, E.; STAFUZZA, N.B.; FERNÁNDEZ, J.; SAURA, S.; VILLANUEVA, B.; TORO, M.A.; BANCHERO, G.; OLIVEIRA, P.S.; ELER, J.P.; BALDI, F.; FERRAZ, J.B.S. Genomic regions and pathways associated with resistance to gastrointestinal parasites in tropical sheep breed. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, v.95, suppl.4.p.107.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|  |
| 4. | | AMORIM, S.T.; KLUSKA, S.; PIATTO BERTON, M.; ANTUNES DE LEMOS, M.V.; PERIPOLLI, E.; BONVINO STAFUZZA, N.; FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN, J.; SAURA ÁLVAREZ, M.; VILLANUEVA GAVIÑA, B.; TORO, M.A.; BANCHERO, G.; SILVA OLIVEIRA, P.; GRIGOLETTO, L.; PEREIRA ELER, J.; BALDI, F.; STERMAN FERRAZ, J.B. Genomic study for maternal related traits in Santa Inês sheep breed. Livestock Science, November 2018, Volume 217, Pages 76-84. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.09.011 Article history: Received 23 January 2018 // Revised 6 September 2018 // Accepted 11 September 2018 // Available online 20 September 2018.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 5. | | SOUZA CONGIO, G. F. DE; BANNINK, A.; MAYORGA, MOGOLLÓN, O. L.; NICOLOV HRISTOV, A.; JAURENA, G.; GONDA, H.; GERE, J. I.; CERÓN-CUCCHI, M.E.; ORTIZ-CHURA, A.; TIERI, M.P.; HERNÁNDEZ, O.; RICCI, P.; JULIARENA, M.P.; LOMBARDI, B.; ABDALLA, A.L.; ABDALLA-FILHO, A.L.; BERNDT, A.; ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, P. P.; HENRIQUE, F. L.; GOMEZ MONTEIRO, A.L.; BORGES, L. I.; RIBEIRO-FILHO, H.M.N.; RIBEIRO PEREIRA, L.G.; RIBEIRO TOMICH, T.; MAGALHAES CAMPOS, M.; SAMARINI MACHADO, F.; MARCONDES, M. I.; ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, M. E.; SANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, L.; GALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, L.; FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. DE; ROSSETTO, J.; SAVIAN, J.V.; MAZZA RODRIGUES, P. H.; PERNA JÚNIOR, F.; MOREIRA, T.S.; MAURÍCIO, R. M.; PACHECO RODRIGUES, J.P.; CRUZ BORGES, A.L. DA C.; REIS E SILVA, R.; FERREIRA LAGE, H.; ANDRADE REIS, R.; RUGGIERI, A.C.; CARDOSO, A. DA SILVA; SILVA, S. CARNEIRO DA; BARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, M.; VALADARES-FILHO, S. DE CAMPOS; SILVA, F. A. DE SALES; ZANETTI, D.; BERCHIELLI, T.T.; DUARTE MESSANA, J.; MUÑOZ, C.; ARIZA-NIETO, C.J.; SIERRA-ALARCÓN, L.I.; GUALDRÓN-DUARTE, L.B.; MESTRA-VARGAS, L.I.; MOLINA-BOTERO, I. C.; BARAHONA-ROSALES, R.; ARANGO, J.; GAVIRIA-URIBE, X.; GIRALDO VALDERRAMA, L.A.; ROSERO-NOGUERA, J.R.; POSADA-OCHOA, S.L.; ABARCA-MONGE, SERGIO; SOTO-BLANCO, R.; KU-VERA, J.C.; JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, R.; FLORES-SANTIAGO, E. DEL J.; CASTELÁN-ORTEGA, O.A.; VÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, M.F.; BENAOUDA, M.; GÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A.; ALVARADO BOLOVICH, V.I.; DÍAZ CÉSPEDES, M.A.; ASTIGARRAGA, L. Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. v. 312, art. 127693, 13 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693 Article history: Receiived 22 December 2020; Received in revised form 24 April 2021; Accepted 25 May 2021. Available online 30 May 2021.
Latin America Methane Project Collaborators está integrada por 71 investigadores en este artículo.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 1 |
|
Autor : |
GARCÍA-PRÉCHAC, F.; ERNST, O.; SIRI-PRIETO, G.; TERRA, J.A. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Integrating no-till into crop-pasture rotations in Uruguay: review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil & Tillage Research, 2004, v. 77, p. 1-13. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history:Received 21 February 2003 ; received in revised form 27 November 2003 ; accepted 9 December 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002 |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract
Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently,
approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition factor to optimize N and water availability, and soil tilth. Chiseling or paraplowing can alleviate plow-pans inherited by NT from previous CT; but higher soil strength at the soil surface under NT contributes to better forage utilization
under grazing. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content in CC decreased with CT, and was maintained with NT only if grain was harvested. In CC systems with harvested forage, SOC decreased even with NT. CPR with NT maintained or increased the original SOC content. The paper concludes with a discussion on the relative sustainability of CC versus CPR with NT. Both are sustainable from the soil quality and productivity standpoints. But compared with CC, CPR is a more economically and climatically buffered system, due to higher diversity. Also, CPR systems are more environmentally sustainable since fuel and agrochemicals usage is reduced approximately 50%. MenosAbstract
Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently,
approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition fact... Presentar Todo |
|
Thesagro : |
COMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO; EROSIÓN DEL SUELO; PASTURAS; ROTACION DE CULTIVOS; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03223naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1032788
005 2019-10-11
008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002$2DOI
100 1 $aGARCÍA-PRÉCHAC, F.
245 $aIntegrating no-till into crop-pasture rotations in Uruguay$breview.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2004
500 $aArticle history:Received 21 February 2003 ; received in revised form 27 November 2003 ; accepted 9 December 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002
520 $aAbstract Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently, approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition factor to optimize N and water availability, and soil tilth. Chiseling or paraplowing can alleviate plow-pans inherited by NT from previous CT; but higher soil strength at the soil surface under NT contributes to better forage utilization under grazing. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content in CC decreased with CT, and was maintained with NT only if grain was harvested. In CC systems with harvested forage, SOC decreased even with NT. CPR with NT maintained or increased the original SOC content. The paper concludes with a discussion on the relative sustainability of CC versus CPR with NT. Both are sustainable from the soil quality and productivity standpoints. But compared with CC, CPR is a more economically and climatically buffered system, due to higher diversity. Also, CPR systems are more environmentally sustainable since fuel and agrochemicals usage is reduced approximately 50%.
650 $aCOMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO
650 $aEROSIÓN DEL SUELO
650 $aPASTURAS
650 $aROTACION DE CULTIVOS
650 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aERNST, O.
700 1 $aSIRI-PRIETO, G.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
773 $tSoil & Tillage Research, 2004$gv. 77, p. 1-13.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
