| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 11 | |
| 2. |  | PALLADINO, C.; PAREJA, L.; PEREYRA, S.; PÉREZ, C. Problems of pesticide residues in grains. [La problemática de los residuos de fitosanitarios en granos]. [Problemática dos resíduos de fitossanitários em grãos]. I Technical Conference of the Plant Protection Group - EEMAC. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2023, Vol.27 (Supplement), e1230. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.27.1230 -- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 24 Jul 2032; Accepted 25 Jul 2023; Published 11 Sep 2023. -- Editor: Horacio Silva, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Paysandú, Uruguay. -- Correspondence: Cintia Palladino,...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 3. | | PALLADINO, C.; PÉREZ, C.A.; PAREJA, L.; PÉREZ-PARADA. A.; FRANCO, J.; PEREYRA, S. Fungicide strategies for Ramularia Leaf Spot control recommended in Uruguay and its residues in barley grains. [Estrategias de fungicidas recomendadas para el control de ramulariosis en Uruguay y sus residuos en granos de cebada.]. [Estratégias de fungicidas para o controlo da ramulariose recomendadas no Uruguai e respectivos resíduos nos grãos de cevada.]. Section. Plant protection. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2024, Vol.28, e1262. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.28.1262 -- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 04 October 2023; Accepted 01 December 2023; Published 01 February 2024. -- Editor: María Inés Siri, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. -- Correspondence: Cintia Palladino, cpalladino@cup.edu.uy --...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 5. | | PALLADINO, C.; MUELA, A.; TABORDA, B.; PUIGVERT, F.; PÉREZ-PARADA, A.; COLAZZO, M.; PÉREZ, C. A.; PEREYRA, S.; PAREJA, L. Application of a straightforward Mmthodology by LC-QqQ-MS/MS and GC-MS to ensure food safety of barley and wheat grain. ACS Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 371-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00263 Article history: Received 29 November 2021; Accepted 24 February 2022; Revised 4 February 2022; Published online 16 March 2022; Published in issue 18 April 2022.
Corresponding author: Pareja, L.; Departamento de Química Del...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 6. | | PAREJA, L.; COLAZZO, M.; PÉREZ-PARADA, A.; NIELL, S.; CARRASCO-LETELIER, L.; BESIL, N.; CESIO, M.V.; HEINZEN, H. Detection of pesticides in active and depopulated beehives in Uruguay International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2011, v. 8, n. 10, p. 3844-3858 OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 7. | | NIELL, S.; PAREJA, L.; ASTEGGIANTE, L.G.; ROEHRS, R.; PIZZUTTI, I.R.; GARCIA, C.; HEINZEN, H.; CESIO, M.V. Development of methods for multiresidue analysis of rice post-emergence herbicides in loam soil and their possible applications to soils of different composition. Journal of AOAC International, 2010, v. 93 no.2, p. 425-431. 2-s2.0-77952781014| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 8. | | Cesio, V.; Pareja, L.; Niell, S.; Geis Asteggiante, L.; Bocking, B.; García, C.; Fernández, G.; Fernández-Alba, A.R.; Heinzen, H. Critical revision and development perspectives of herbicide residues analysis in Agro Ecosystems 1a.ed. ln: Kortekamp, A. (ed). Herbicides and environment. India: Intech, 2011. p.125-156| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 9. | | NIELL, S.; JESÚS, F.; PÉREZ, N.; PÉREZ, C.; PAREJA, L.; ABATTE, S.; CARRASCO-LETELIER, L.; DIAZ, S.; MENDOZA, Y.; CESIO, V.; HEINZEN, H. Neonicotinoids transference from the field to the hive by honey bees: Towards a pesticide residues biomonitor Science of the Total Environment, 2017, v. 581-582, p. 25-31 Article history: Received 3 October 2016 / Received in revised form 14 December 2016 / Accepted 2 January 2017 / Available online xxxx| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 10. | | PÉREZ, A.; ALONSO, B.; ERNST, F.; RODRÍGUEZ, C.; CESIO, V.; HEINZEN, H.; COLAZZO, M.; PAREJA, L.; PEREIRA, A.; MÁRQUEZ, A.; ERRICO, E. Residuos de plaguicidas en compartimentos ambientales. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2020. 30 p. (Serie FPTA-INIA; 90) Proyecto FPTA 324: "Estudio del impacto de las actuales prácticas agrícolas en los recursos hídricos del bajo Río Negro y Esteros de Farrapos.". Período de ejecución: Mayo 2014 - Junio 2017. Institución Ejecutora: Universidad de la...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 11. | | PEREYRA, S.; CASTRO, M.; VERO, S.; SILVA, P.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; GONZALEZ, N.; BENTOS, D.; ALVAREZ, W.; RABAZA, S.; SEVILLANO, L.; BRANCATTI, G.; FRANCIA, C.; RAFFO, M.A.; GERMAN, S.; PÉREZ, C.; GARMENDIA, G.; PAREJA, L.; RODRÍGUEZ, A.; PENDAS, C.; QUINCKE, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D.; RODRIGUEZ, M. Fusariosis de la espiga en trigo y micotoxinas asociadas: contribuyendo a reducir su riesgo. Cultivos. Revista INIA Uruguay, Diciembre 2023, no.75 p.54-58. (Revista INIA; 75).| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 11 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/02/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/02/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
BERRUETA, C.; HEUVELINK, E.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; DOGLIOTTI, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; EP HEUVELINK, Horticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen UR, Wageningen, the Netherlands; GUSTAVO GIMÉNEZ FRANQUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI MORO, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Estimation of tomato yield gaps for greenhouse in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Scientia Horticulturae, 30 April 2020, Volume 265, 109250. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 28 September 2018 / Revised 20 January 2020 / Accepted 30 January 2020 / Available online 7 February 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by earlier planting, reducing leaf pruning intensity after harvest beginning, and increasing greenhouse transmissivity by more frequent plastic cover renewal and removing roofs? shading screens and whitening.
© 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.
Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Light interception; Solanum lycopersicum; TOMSIM; Yield components; Yield potentail. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02610naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1060797
005 2020-02-12
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250$2DOI
100 1 $aBERRUETA, C.
245 $aEstimation of tomato yield gaps for greenhouse in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 28 September 2018 / Revised 20 January 2020 / Accepted 30 January 2020 / Available online 7 February 2020.
520 $aABSTRACT. Yield gap analysis is a powerful method to explore gap?s breadth between potential yields, attainable and those realized in farmers? fields, identifying constraints to production and assess opportunities to yield increase. We assessed yields and yield components across two seasons, in 110 greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) crops during 2014/15 and 2015/16 in the south region of Uruguay, and compared them with potential and attainable yield. Potential yield was calculated with a simulation model based on photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and light use efficiency, and TOMSIM to estimate assimilate partition and fruit yield. Since yield was primarily determined by cumulative PAR intercepted, a boundary function was fitted to estimate attainable yield as a function of cumulative PAR intercepted. Our study quantified a yield gap of 10.7 kg m−2 or 44 % relative to potential. Overall gap was divided into three components: difference between actual and attainable (45 % of total gap), attainable and potential with actual greenhouse PAR transmissivity (29 % of total gap) and between potential with actual transmissivity and potential with 70 % of greenhouse transmissivity (26 % of total gap). For long summer and short spring/summer crops the greatest impact in yield could be obtained by increasing leaf area index by reducing plant lowering operations and leaf pruning intensity, and by increasing plant density. For autumn crops, yield could be improved by earlier planting, reducing leaf pruning intensity after harvest beginning, and increasing greenhouse transmissivity by more frequent plastic cover renewal and removing roofs? shading screens and whitening. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
653 $aLight interception
653 $aSolanum lycopersicum
653 $aTOMSIM
653 $aYield components
653 $aYield potentail
700 1 $aHEUVELINK, E.
700 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, G.
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
773 $tScientia Horticulturae, 30 April 2020, Volume 265, 109250. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109250
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
