|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
11/08/2016 |
Actualizado : |
24/06/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
LINZ, G.M.; BUCHER, E.H.; CANAVELLI, S.B.; RODRIGUEZ, E.; AVERY, M.L. |
Afiliación : |
G.M. LINZ, USDA, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center; E.H. BUCHER, Centro de Zoologia Aplicada, Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal (CONICET-UNC); Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina; S.B. CANAVELLI, INTA (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria)- Paraná; ETHEL RODRIGUEZ, MGAP (Ministerio Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca); L.M. AVERY, USDA, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center. |
Título : |
Limitations of population suppression for protecting crops from bird depredation: A review |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Protection, 2015, v. 76, no. 1, p. 46-52. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.cropro.2015.06.005 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Blackbirds (Icterinae) in North America, and dickcissels (Spiza americana Gmelin), eared doves (Zenaida auriculata Des Murs), and monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus Boddaert) in South America can cause serious economic damage to grain crops. Farmers frequently advocate lethal bird damage abatement measures based on the perceived need to take immediate action to avoid serious economic losses. In comparison, wildlife managers must make informed decisions based on a multitude of factors, including local, state, and national environmental laws, administrative restrictions, logistics, costs, expected outcome, and cultural considerations related to wildlife stewardship. In this paper, we focus on practicality,
environmental safety, cost-effectiveness and wildlife stewardship to evaluate efforts to manage avian crop damage using lethal control. In each case where a lethal program was initiated, at least one of these four tenets was violated and there was temporary relief at best.
© 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
Palabras claves : |
AVIAN PESTS; BLACKBIRDS; CROP DAMAGE; DICKCISSEL; EARED DOVE; GRANVOROUS BIRDS. |
Thesagro : |
AVES; CONTROL DE PÁJAROS; PAJAROS DEPREDADORES. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 01848naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1055234 005 2021-06-24 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.cropro.2015.06.005$2DOI 100 1 $aLINZ, G.M. 245 $aLimitations of population suppression for protecting crops from bird depredation$bA review$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 520 $aABSTRACT. Blackbirds (Icterinae) in North America, and dickcissels (Spiza americana Gmelin), eared doves (Zenaida auriculata Des Murs), and monk parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus Boddaert) in South America can cause serious economic damage to grain crops. Farmers frequently advocate lethal bird damage abatement measures based on the perceived need to take immediate action to avoid serious economic losses. In comparison, wildlife managers must make informed decisions based on a multitude of factors, including local, state, and national environmental laws, administrative restrictions, logistics, costs, expected outcome, and cultural considerations related to wildlife stewardship. In this paper, we focus on practicality, environmental safety, cost-effectiveness and wildlife stewardship to evaluate efforts to manage avian crop damage using lethal control. In each case where a lethal program was initiated, at least one of these four tenets was violated and there was temporary relief at best. © 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 650 $aAVES 650 $aCONTROL DE PÁJAROS 650 $aPAJAROS DEPREDADORES 653 $aAVIAN PESTS 653 $aBLACKBIRDS 653 $aCROP DAMAGE 653 $aDICKCISSEL 653 $aEARED DOVE 653 $aGRANVOROUS BIRDS 700 1 $aBUCHER, E.H. 700 1 $aCANAVELLI, S.B. 700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, E. 700 1 $aAVERY, M.L. 773 $tCrop Protection, 2015$gv. 76, no. 1, p. 46-52.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
28/09/2018 |
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
LOPES, R.B.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; CANELLAS, L.C; GONZALEZ, F.A.L.; CORRÊA, R.F.; PEREIRA, P.R.R.X; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. |
Afiliación : |
RÚBIA BRANCO LOPES, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul,Brazil.; MARIA EUGÊNIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.; LEONARDO CANALLI CANELLAS, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.; FREDY ANDREY LOPEZ GONZALEZ, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul,Brazil.; RICARDO FARIA CORRÊA, Department of Production and Transportation Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.; PAULO RODRIGO RAMOS XAVIER PEREIRA, Department of Agronomy, Federal University of Piauí, Bom Jesus, Brazil.; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul,Brazil. |
Título : |
Bioeconomic simulation of compensatory growth in beef cattle production systems. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Livestock Science, October 2018, v.216,p.165-173. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.livsci.2018.08.011 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 20 December 2017//Revised 23 August 2018// Accepted 23 August 2018 // Available online 24 August 2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract: The manipulation of growth can be used as a strategy to reduce feeding costs. The objective of this study was to analyze, by deterministic and stochastic simulation, compensatory growth effects on the bioeconomic results of growing-finishing beef cattle systems. Four beef cattle systems were simulated with different feed restriction periods (no restriction, CONT; 90 days of restriction, COMP90; 120 days of restriction, COMP120; and 150 days of restriction, COMP150). Risk analysis was performed using the Monte Carlo method. Animals in feed restriction systems demonstrated partial compensation and required longer periods to achieve slaughter weight than CONT steers (16, 23 and 27 more days for COMP90, COMP120 and COMP150, respectively). The CONT system was the most productive (466 kg/ha/year), followed by COMP90 (443 kg/ha/year), COMP120 (432 kg/ha/year), and COMP150 (383 kg/ha/year). The most profitable system was the COMP90 system (US$ 161/ha) followed by the CONT (US$ 144/ha). The lower net margin was observed in the COMP120 (US$ 107/ha) and COMP150 (US$ 90/ha) systems. The risk analysis showed that COMP90 presented the highest financial stability. For all simulated systems, prices of finished steers, feeder calves, and corn were the variables with the greatest effects on net margin. The use of compensatory growth can be a tool to reduce feeding costs in beef cattle systems; however, the feed restriction must not be longer than three months. |
Palabras claves : |
COMPENSATION; COMPENSATORY GAIN; COMPENSATORY INDEX; CRECIMIENTO COMPENSATORIO; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN DE GANADO VACUNO; STOCHASTIC SIMULATION. |
Thesagro : |
BOVINO DE CARNE. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
Marc : |
LEADER 02504naa a2200301 a 4500 001 1059090 005 2019-10-09 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.livsci.2018.08.011$2DOI 100 1 $aLOPES, R.B. 245 $aBioeconomic simulation of compensatory growth in beef cattle production systems.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Received 20 December 2017//Revised 23 August 2018// Accepted 23 August 2018 // Available online 24 August 2018. 520 $aAbstract: The manipulation of growth can be used as a strategy to reduce feeding costs. The objective of this study was to analyze, by deterministic and stochastic simulation, compensatory growth effects on the bioeconomic results of growing-finishing beef cattle systems. Four beef cattle systems were simulated with different feed restriction periods (no restriction, CONT; 90 days of restriction, COMP90; 120 days of restriction, COMP120; and 150 days of restriction, COMP150). Risk analysis was performed using the Monte Carlo method. Animals in feed restriction systems demonstrated partial compensation and required longer periods to achieve slaughter weight than CONT steers (16, 23 and 27 more days for COMP90, COMP120 and COMP150, respectively). The CONT system was the most productive (466 kg/ha/year), followed by COMP90 (443 kg/ha/year), COMP120 (432 kg/ha/year), and COMP150 (383 kg/ha/year). The most profitable system was the COMP90 system (US$ 161/ha) followed by the CONT (US$ 144/ha). The lower net margin was observed in the COMP120 (US$ 107/ha) and COMP150 (US$ 90/ha) systems. The risk analysis showed that COMP90 presented the highest financial stability. For all simulated systems, prices of finished steers, feeder calves, and corn were the variables with the greatest effects on net margin. The use of compensatory growth can be a tool to reduce feeding costs in beef cattle systems; however, the feed restriction must not be longer than three months. 650 $aBOVINO DE CARNE 653 $aCOMPENSATION 653 $aCOMPENSATORY GAIN 653 $aCOMPENSATORY INDEX 653 $aCRECIMIENTO COMPENSATORIO 653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN DE GANADO VACUNO 653 $aSTOCHASTIC SIMULATION 700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A. 700 1 $aCANELLAS, L.C 700 1 $aGONZALEZ, F.A.L. 700 1 $aCORRÊA, R.F. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, P.R.R.X 700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J.O.J. 773 $tLivestock Science, October 2018$gv.216,p.165-173.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|