| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
22/02/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
22/02/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
CABRERA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; UBERTI, A.; ZOPPOLO, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
CARLOS DANILO CABRERA BOLOGNA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ BRUNO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. UBERTI, Federal University of Fronteira Sul - UFFS, Chapeco?, Brazil.; ROBERTO JOSE ZOPPOLO GOLDSCHMIDT, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Productive behavior of 'Williams' pear (Pyrus communis L.) grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Acta Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 145-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22 |
|
ISSN : |
0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) |
|
DOI : |
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present differences among the tested rootstocks. 'BA29' induced higher fruit weight in comparison to 'OH×F69' and a firmer fruit compared to 'OH×F69' and 'OH×F40', in the 2016/17 growing season. For productivity, it was observed that 'OH×F40' was superior in the 2014/15 growing season, while in the 2016/17 growing season all Pyrus rootstocks were substantially superior. Results showed that Pyrus rootstocks had better performance compared to quince under optimal conditions but were less robust when climatic conditions (chill units and precipitation) were not good for pear cultivation.
@ International Society for Horticultural Science. MenosAbstract:
The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present difference... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS; FRUTICULTURE; Interstem; QUINCE; URUGUAY. |
|
Thesagro : |
MEMBRILLO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03214naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1061741
005 2021-02-22
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic)
024 7 $a10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22$2DOI
100 1 $aCABRERA, D.
245 $aProductive behavior of 'Williams' pear (Pyrus communis L.) grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein.
520 $aAbstract: The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present differences among the tested rootstocks. 'BA29' induced higher fruit weight in comparison to 'OH×F69' and a firmer fruit compared to 'OH×F69' and 'OH×F40', in the 2016/17 growing season. For productivity, it was observed that 'OH×F40' was superior in the 2014/15 growing season, while in the 2016/17 growing season all Pyrus rootstocks were substantially superior. Results showed that Pyrus rootstocks had better performance compared to quince under optimal conditions but were less robust when climatic conditions (chill units and precipitation) were not good for pear cultivation. @ International Society for Horticultural Science.
650 $aMEMBRILLO
653 $aCLIMATIC CONDITIONS
653 $aFRUTICULTURE
653 $aInterstem
653 $aQUINCE
653 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, P.
700 1 $aUBERTI, A.
700 1 $aZOPPOLO, R.
773 $tActa Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 145-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
11/07/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
B - 1 |
|
Autor : |
KNUPP, S.H.R.; KNUPP, L.S.; RIET-CORREA, F.; LUCENA, R.B. |
|
Afiliación : |
SHEILA NOGUEIRA RIBEIRO KNUPP, Discente do Programa de Doutorado em Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, UFCG, Patos, PB, Brasil.; LEONARDO SIDNEY KNUPP, Discente do Programa de Doutorado Integrado em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, UFPB, Areia, PB, Brasil.; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Prof. Dr., Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Unidade Acadêmica de Medicina Veterinária, UFCG-CSTR, Patos, PB.; RICARDO BARBOSA LUCENA, Prof. Dr., Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Agrárrias, CCA-UFPB, Areia, PB.,Brasil. |
|
Título : |
Plants that cause photosensitivity in ruminants in Brazil. (Plantas que causam fotossensibilização em ruminantes no Brasil). |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 37, n. 4, p. 2009-2020, jul./ago. 2016. |
|
DOI : |
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p2009 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: This study aimed to review the mechanisms of action, clinical signs, pathology, and toxic compounds of plants that cause photosensitivity in ruminants. In addition, we sought to clarify the diagnostic methods and prophylaxis of photosensitivity-induced plants. Photosensitizing plants constitute an important group of poisonous plants in Brazil and there are at least seventeen species distributed in nine genera. Some of these plants have well known toxic compounds; in others, the substance responsible for the disease is unknown. In general, the photosensitivity can be classified as primary or secondary. Among the plants causing primary photosensitivity in Brazil, Ammi majus contains furocoumarins, while the compound in Froelichia humboldtiana remains uncertain. The known toxic compounds causing secondary photosensitivity include pyrrolizidine alkaloids, furans sesquiterpenes, triterpenes, and steroidal saponins. In other plants causing secondary photosensitization, including Stryphnodendron spp. and Enterolobium spp., the toxic compound is still unknown. Future research should be conducted in order to determine the various mechanisms of action of each toxic compound to assist the diagnosis of photosensitivity, to develop less toxic or non-toxic cultivars, or even to find new ways of preventing photosensitization. |
|
Palabras claves : |
COWS; GOATS; INTOXICATION; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANIMAL; POISONOUS PLANTS; SHEEP. |
|
Thesagro : |
CABRAS; INTOXICACION; OVEJAS; VACA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
E16 Enfermedades de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02202naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1057373
005 2019-10-09
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4p2009$2DOI
100 1 $aKNUPP, S.H.R.
245 $aPlants that cause photosensitivity in ruminants in Brazil. (Plantas que causam fotossensibilização em ruminantes no Brasil).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aAbstract: This study aimed to review the mechanisms of action, clinical signs, pathology, and toxic compounds of plants that cause photosensitivity in ruminants. In addition, we sought to clarify the diagnostic methods and prophylaxis of photosensitivity-induced plants. Photosensitizing plants constitute an important group of poisonous plants in Brazil and there are at least seventeen species distributed in nine genera. Some of these plants have well known toxic compounds; in others, the substance responsible for the disease is unknown. In general, the photosensitivity can be classified as primary or secondary. Among the plants causing primary photosensitivity in Brazil, Ammi majus contains furocoumarins, while the compound in Froelichia humboldtiana remains uncertain. The known toxic compounds causing secondary photosensitivity include pyrrolizidine alkaloids, furans sesquiterpenes, triterpenes, and steroidal saponins. In other plants causing secondary photosensitization, including Stryphnodendron spp. and Enterolobium spp., the toxic compound is still unknown. Future research should be conducted in order to determine the various mechanisms of action of each toxic compound to assist the diagnosis of photosensitivity, to develop less toxic or non-toxic cultivars, or even to find new ways of preventing photosensitization.
650 $aCABRAS
650 $aINTOXICACION
650 $aOVEJAS
650 $aVACA
653 $aCOWS
653 $aGOATS
653 $aINTOXICATION
653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aPOISONOUS PLANTS
653 $aSHEEP
700 1 $aKNUPP, L.S.
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
700 1 $aLUCENA, R.B.
773 $tSemina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina$gv. 37, n. 4, p. 2009-2020, jul./ago. 2016.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
