|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
28/10/2024 |
Actualizado : |
28/10/2024 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
PLOSCHUK, R. A.; MIRALLES, D. J.; KAVANOVÁ, M.; STRIKER, G. G. |
Afiliación : |
ROCIO ANTONELLA PLOSCHUK, Facultad de Agronomía, IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; DANIEL JULIO MIRALLES, Facultad de Agronomía, IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; MONIKA KAVANOVÁ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO GABRIEL STRIKER, Facultad de Agronomía, IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Faculty of Science, School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. |
Título : |
Identifying the numerical components affecting soybean (Glycine max) yield under waterlogging at reproductive stages. |
Complemento del título : |
Original article. Flooding Stress / Waterlogging. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2024, Volume 210, Issue 5, e12764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12764 |
ISSN : |
0931-2250; e-ISSN: 1439-037X |
DOI : |
10.1111/jac.12764 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 May 2024, Revised 1 September 2024, Accepted 3 September 2024. -- Correspondence: Ploschuk, R.; Facultad de Agronomía, IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; email:rploschuk@agro.uba.ar -- Funding: This work was supported by Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT 20020220300073BA) and Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (Grant number ANPCyT PICT-PICT-2021-00056). -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Waterlogging is a critical abiotic stress increasing in importance due to more intense, erratic rainfall associated with climate change. Waterlogging leads to significant yield losses in sensitive crops, such as soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). Identifying soybean genotypes and traits associated with better waterlogging tolerance is of high interest. We assessed the response of six soybean genotypes, selected from a field screening of over 190 genotypes, to 10 days of waterlogging at the R1 (onset of flowering) and R4 (grain filling) stages. We evaluated yield and its components, as well as shoot and root dry weights (DW) at the end of the waterlogging treatments and at maturity, along with morphological traits such as plant branch number, stem diameter and plant height. By integrating all these traits, a waterlogging tolerance index (WTI) was calculated for each genotype to rank their sensitivity. The WTI showed variations among genotypes from 0.61 to 0.77, indicating genotypic variation in response to waterlogging. Greater reductions in root DW compared to shoot DW were observed immediately after waterlogging. By maturity, shoot DW of waterlogged plants was more severely reduced than root DW in all genotypes. Despite similar DW losses at R1 and R4 at physiological maturity, seed number per plant and 100-seed weight responses differed between the treatments. Genotypes that performed well under control conditions suffered significant yield reductions of 70%-85% after waterlogging, mainly due to fewer fertile nodes and seeds per pod, with some also experiencing a notable decrease in 100-seed weight. In contrast, other genotypes had milder responses, with less severe reductions in seed and pod traits. Identifying breeding soybean genotypes tolerant to waterlogging during reproductive stages that maintain the number of fertile nodes and pods per node without changes in seeds per pod could significantly mitigate yield losses from waterlogging. © 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. MenosABSTRACT.- Waterlogging is a critical abiotic stress increasing in importance due to more intense, erratic rainfall associated with climate change. Waterlogging leads to significant yield losses in sensitive crops, such as soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). Identifying soybean genotypes and traits associated with better waterlogging tolerance is of high interest. We assessed the response of six soybean genotypes, selected from a field screening of over 190 genotypes, to 10 days of waterlogging at the R1 (onset of flowering) and R4 (grain filling) stages. We evaluated yield and its components, as well as shoot and root dry weights (DW) at the end of the waterlogging treatments and at maturity, along with morphological traits such as plant branch number, stem diameter and plant height. By integrating all these traits, a waterlogging tolerance index (WTI) was calculated for each genotype to rank their sensitivity. The WTI showed variations among genotypes from 0.61 to 0.77, indicating genotypic variation in response to waterlogging. Greater reductions in root DW compared to shoot DW were observed immediately after waterlogging. By maturity, shoot DW of waterlogged plants was more severely reduced than root DW in all genotypes. Despite similar DW losses at R1 and R4 at physiological maturity, seed number per plant and 100-seed weight responses differed between the treatments. Genotypes that performed well under control conditions suffered significant yield reductions of 70%-85% a... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ÁREA DE MEJORAMIENTO GENÉTICO Y BIOTECNOLOGÍA VEGETAL - INIA; Genotypic variability; Root biomass; Shoot biomass; Soybean; Waterlogging; Yield. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 03448naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1064898 005 2024-10-28 008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0931-2250; e-ISSN: 1439-037X 024 7 $a10.1111/jac.12764$2DOI 100 1 $aPLOSCHUK, R. A. 245 $aIdentifying the numerical components affecting soybean (Glycine max) yield under waterlogging at reproductive stages.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2024 500 $aArticle history: Received 30 May 2024, Revised 1 September 2024, Accepted 3 September 2024. -- Correspondence: Ploschuk, R.; Facultad de Agronomía, IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; email:rploschuk@agro.uba.ar -- Funding: This work was supported by Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT 20020220300073BA) and Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (Grant number ANPCyT PICT-PICT-2021-00056). -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- Waterlogging is a critical abiotic stress increasing in importance due to more intense, erratic rainfall associated with climate change. Waterlogging leads to significant yield losses in sensitive crops, such as soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). Identifying soybean genotypes and traits associated with better waterlogging tolerance is of high interest. We assessed the response of six soybean genotypes, selected from a field screening of over 190 genotypes, to 10 days of waterlogging at the R1 (onset of flowering) and R4 (grain filling) stages. We evaluated yield and its components, as well as shoot and root dry weights (DW) at the end of the waterlogging treatments and at maturity, along with morphological traits such as plant branch number, stem diameter and plant height. By integrating all these traits, a waterlogging tolerance index (WTI) was calculated for each genotype to rank their sensitivity. The WTI showed variations among genotypes from 0.61 to 0.77, indicating genotypic variation in response to waterlogging. Greater reductions in root DW compared to shoot DW were observed immediately after waterlogging. By maturity, shoot DW of waterlogged plants was more severely reduced than root DW in all genotypes. Despite similar DW losses at R1 and R4 at physiological maturity, seed number per plant and 100-seed weight responses differed between the treatments. Genotypes that performed well under control conditions suffered significant yield reductions of 70%-85% after waterlogging, mainly due to fewer fertile nodes and seeds per pod, with some also experiencing a notable decrease in 100-seed weight. In contrast, other genotypes had milder responses, with less severe reductions in seed and pod traits. Identifying breeding soybean genotypes tolerant to waterlogging during reproductive stages that maintain the number of fertile nodes and pods per node without changes in seeds per pod could significantly mitigate yield losses from waterlogging. © 2024 Wiley-VCH GmbH. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 653 $aÁREA DE MEJORAMIENTO GENÉTICO Y BIOTECNOLOGÍA VEGETAL - INIA 653 $aGenotypic variability 653 $aRoot biomass 653 $aShoot biomass 653 $aSoybean 653 $aWaterlogging 653 $aYield 700 1 $aMIRALLES, D. J. 700 1 $aKAVANOVÁ, M. 700 1 $aSTRIKER, G. G. 773 $tJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2024, Volume 210, Issue 5, e12764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12764
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registros recuperados : 2 | |
1. |  | Lena, J.; Grasso, E.; Gorriti, F.; Capurro, R.; Brum, C.; Debrum, D.; Salvarrey, L. Producción animal en función de la situación forrajera en el area de la regional Salto-Artigas del Plan Agropecuario ln: Seminario Nacional de Campo Natural, 2 : 1990 nov 15-16 : Tacuarembó Montevideo (Uruguay): Hemisferio Sur, 1990. p407-418 Participaron del Seminario : INIA, Sociedad Uruguaya de Pasturas Naturales, Facultad de Agronomía, Plan AgropecuarioBiblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|   |
2. |  | Salvarrey, L.; Lena, J.; Grasso, E.; Gorriti, F.; Brum, D. de Sinco- Sistema integral computarizado para procesamiento de datos para gestión agropecuaria : versión 2 ln: Seminario Nacional de Campo Natural, 2 : 1990 nov 15-16 : Tacuarembó Montevideo (Uruguay): Hemisferio Sur, 1990. p419-449 Participaron del Seminario : INIA, Sociedad Uruguaya de Pasturas Naturales, Facultad de Agronomía, Plan AgropecuarioBiblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|   |
Registros recuperados : 2 | |
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|