| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
11/07/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/07/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
TURNER, J.A.; GUESMI, B.; GIL, J. M.; HEANUE, K.; SIERRA, M.; PERCY, H.; BORTAGARAY, I.; CHAMS, N.; MILNE, C. |
|
Afiliación : |
JAMES A TURNER, Farms Systems and Environment, AgResearch, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand; BOUALI GUESMI, Center for Agro-Food Economics and Development (CREDA-UPC-IRTA). Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia, Edifici ESAB, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain; JOSÉ M. GIL, Center for Agro-Food Economics and Development (CREDA-UPC-IRTA). Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia, Edifici ESAB, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain; KEVIN HEANUE, Evaluation Unit, Teagasc, Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway H65 R718, Ireland; MIGUEL OSCAR SIERRA PEREIRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; HELEN PERCY, Adoption and Practice Change, AgResearch, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand; ISABEL BORTAGARAY SABARROS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Instituto de Desarrollo Sostenible, Innovación e Inclusión Social - IDIIS, Universidad de la República, Uruguay; NOUR CHAMS, Center for Agro-Food Economics and Development (CREDA-UPC-IRTA). Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia, Edifici ESAB, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain; University Ramon Llull - IQS School of Management Via Augusta 390, 08017, Barcelona, Spain; CATH MILNE, Formerly SRUC, Peter Wilson Building, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK. |
|
Título : |
Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: Emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Evaluation and Program Planning, October 2022, Volume 94, 102127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127 |
|
ISSN : |
0149-7189 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 6 August 2021, Revised 27 April 2022, Accepted 25 June 2022, Available online 28 June 2022, Version of Record 6 July 2022.
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: james.turner@agresearch.co.nz (J.A. Turner), bouali.guesmi@upc.edu (B. Guesmi), chema.gil@upc.edu (J.M. Gil), kevin.heanue@teagasc.ie
(K. Heanue), msierra@inia.org.uy (M. Sierra), helen.percy@agresearch.co.nz (H. Percy), isabelbortagaray@gmail.com (I. Bortagaray), nour.chams@upc.edu
(N. Chams), cemilne@live.com (C. Milne). -- This work was supported by the Strategic Partnership; Strategic Science Investment Fund, New Zealand; Scottish Government; Teagasc; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) in Uruguay; and the Societal Impact of R&D Investments [IRTA project-61095]. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Performance-based funding and calls for public-funded science to demonstrate societal impact are encouraging public research organisations to evaluate impact, the so-called impact agenda. This paper explores evaluation methods of four fully or partially public-funded agricultural research organisations and how they are building evaluative capacity to respond to the impact agenda. Drawing on cross-organisational comparison of the readiness of each organisation to implement evaluation, the implications for improving evaluative capacity building (ECB) are discussed. This study extends the current literature on ECB, as very little has focussed on research organisations in general, and particularly agricultural research. Driven by the impact agenda, the organisations are beginning to emphasise summative evaluation. Organisational leaders valuing the demonstration of impact and commitment to building evaluation capacity are important precursors to other aspects of organisational readiness to implement evaluation. However, organisational emphasis remains on using evaluation for accountability and to improve efficiency and allocation of funding. The organisations have yet to systematically embed evaluation processes and capabilities for learning at programme and organisation-levels. There is, therefore, an opportunity to develop organisation and programme-level evaluation processes that inform each other and the pathways to impact from science. To realise this opportunity, organisations could strengthen internal and external networks of evaluation practitioners and academics to bridge the gap between the theory and practice of monitoring and evaluation for learning (MEL) and to begin to reshape organisational culture by using evaluation methods that are grounded in co-production and integrated scientific and societal values.
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.- Performance-based funding and calls for public-funded science to demonstrate societal impact are encouraging public research organisations to evaluate impact, the so-called impact agenda. This paper explores evaluation methods of four fully or partially public-funded agricultural research organisations and how they are building evaluative capacity to respond to the impact agenda. Drawing on cross-organisational comparison of the readiness of each organisation to implement evaluation, the implications for improving evaluative capacity building (ECB) are discussed. This study extends the current literature on ECB, as very little has focussed on research organisations in general, and particularly agricultural research. Driven by the impact agenda, the organisations are beginning to emphasise summative evaluation. Organisational leaders valuing the demonstration of impact and commitment to building evaluation capacity are important precursors to other aspects of organisational readiness to implement evaluation. However, organisational emphasis remains on using evaluation for accountability and to improve efficiency and allocation of funding. The organisations have yet to systematically embed evaluation processes and capabilities for learning at programme and organisation-levels. There is, therefore, an opportunity to develop organisation and programme-level evaluation processes that inform each other and the pathways to impact from science. To realise this opportunity... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Agricultural research impact; Building; Monitoring and evaluation, evaluation capacity. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03662naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1063412
005 2022-07-11
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0149-7189
024 7 $a10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127$2DOI
100 1 $aTURNER, J.A.
245 $aEvaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda$bEmerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 6 August 2021, Revised 27 April 2022, Accepted 25 June 2022, Available online 28 June 2022, Version of Record 6 July 2022. Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: james.turner@agresearch.co.nz (J.A. Turner), bouali.guesmi@upc.edu (B. Guesmi), chema.gil@upc.edu (J.M. Gil), kevin.heanue@teagasc.ie (K. Heanue), msierra@inia.org.uy (M. Sierra), helen.percy@agresearch.co.nz (H. Percy), isabelbortagaray@gmail.com (I. Bortagaray), nour.chams@upc.edu (N. Chams), cemilne@live.com (C. Milne). -- This work was supported by the Strategic Partnership; Strategic Science Investment Fund, New Zealand; Scottish Government; Teagasc; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) in Uruguay; and the Societal Impact of R&D Investments [IRTA project-61095].
520 $aABSTRACT.- Performance-based funding and calls for public-funded science to demonstrate societal impact are encouraging public research organisations to evaluate impact, the so-called impact agenda. This paper explores evaluation methods of four fully or partially public-funded agricultural research organisations and how they are building evaluative capacity to respond to the impact agenda. Drawing on cross-organisational comparison of the readiness of each organisation to implement evaluation, the implications for improving evaluative capacity building (ECB) are discussed. This study extends the current literature on ECB, as very little has focussed on research organisations in general, and particularly agricultural research. Driven by the impact agenda, the organisations are beginning to emphasise summative evaluation. Organisational leaders valuing the demonstration of impact and commitment to building evaluation capacity are important precursors to other aspects of organisational readiness to implement evaluation. However, organisational emphasis remains on using evaluation for accountability and to improve efficiency and allocation of funding. The organisations have yet to systematically embed evaluation processes and capabilities for learning at programme and organisation-levels. There is, therefore, an opportunity to develop organisation and programme-level evaluation processes that inform each other and the pathways to impact from science. To realise this opportunity, organisations could strengthen internal and external networks of evaluation practitioners and academics to bridge the gap between the theory and practice of monitoring and evaluation for learning (MEL) and to begin to reshape organisational culture by using evaluation methods that are grounded in co-production and integrated scientific and societal values. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
653 $aAgricultural research impact
653 $aBuilding
653 $aMonitoring and evaluation, evaluation capacity
700 1 $aGUESMI, B.
700 1 $aGIL, J. M.
700 1 $aHEANUE, K.
700 1 $aSIERRA, M.
700 1 $aPERCY, H.
700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I.
700 1 $aCHAMS, N.
700 1 $aMILNE, C.
773 $tEvaluation and Program Planning, October 2022, Volume 94, 102127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
06/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
23/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
B - 3 |
|
Autor : |
TAKEDA, F.; SORIA, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
JORGE RAUL SORIA BARAIBAR, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Method for producing long-cane blackberry plants. (Research report). |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2011 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
HortTechnology, 2011, v.21, no.5, p.563-568. |
|
ISSN : |
1063-0198 |
|
DOI : |
10.21273/HORTTECH.21.5.563 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Print Publication: 01 October 2011 / Online Publication: Oct 2011. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The objective of this study was to evaluate primocane cane training and propagation techniques for the production of long-cane blackberry (Rubus spp.) plants. Seventeen to 29 6-ft-long canes were produced from each semierect 'Triple Crown' and trailing 'Siskiyou' blackberry plant grown on the rotating cross-arm (RCA) trellis and cane training system. By early August, the lateral canes had grown beyond the top wire ≈6 ft above the ground and continued growing downward to the ground. The tips of the lateral canes reached the soil level from mid-August to mid-September at which time they were placed in 1/2-gal pots containing peatbased media. In early Oct. 2009, the tip-rooted lateral canes were cut from the stock plant at the uppermost trellis wire. Among the long-cane plants produced in 2009, 76% of buds in 'Siskiyou' broke, but less than 30% of buds in 'Triple Crown' broke in a heated greenhouse. Flowering occurred in 15% of the shoots that developed on rooted 'Siskiyou' long canes, but the shoots on the long-cane plants of 'Triple Crown' were morphologically vegetative and flowering did not occur. In 2010-11, the long-cane plants were detached from the stock plants in December, January, and March. The numbers of nodes with a flowering shoot improved to 41% and 16% and the number of flowers per shoot increased to two and five flowers on long-cane plants of 'Siskiyou' and 'Triple Crown' blackberry, respectively.
© 2011 by the American Society for Horticultural Science. MenosABSTRACT.
The objective of this study was to evaluate primocane cane training and propagation techniques for the production of long-cane blackberry (Rubus spp.) plants. Seventeen to 29 6-ft-long canes were produced from each semierect 'Triple Crown' and trailing 'Siskiyou' blackberry plant grown on the rotating cross-arm (RCA) trellis and cane training system. By early August, the lateral canes had grown beyond the top wire ≈6 ft above the ground and continued growing downward to the ground. The tips of the lateral canes reached the soil level from mid-August to mid-September at which time they were placed in 1/2-gal pots containing peatbased media. In early Oct. 2009, the tip-rooted lateral canes were cut from the stock plant at the uppermost trellis wire. Among the long-cane plants produced in 2009, 76% of buds in 'Siskiyou' broke, but less than 30% of buds in 'Triple Crown' broke in a heated greenhouse. Flowering occurred in 15% of the shoots that developed on rooted 'Siskiyou' long canes, but the shoots on the long-cane plants of 'Triple Crown' were morphologically vegetative and flowering did not occur. In 2010-11, the long-cane plants were detached from the stock plants in December, January, and March. The numbers of nodes with a flowering shoot improved to 41% and 16% and the number of flowers per shoot increased to two and five flowers on long-cane plants of 'Siskiyou' and 'Triple Crown' blackberry, respectively.
© 2011 by the American Society for Horticultur... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ZARZAMORA. |
|
Thesagro : |
MICROPROPAGACIÓN; PROPAGACIÓN VEGETATIVA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F02 Propagación de plantas |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02168naa a2200205 a 4500
001 1050931
005 2019-10-23
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1063-0198
024 7 $a10.21273/HORTTECH.21.5.563$2DOI
100 1 $aTAKEDA, F.
245 $aMethod for producing long-cane blackberry plants. (Research report).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2011
500 $aArticle history: Print Publication: 01 October 2011 / Online Publication: Oct 2011.
520 $aABSTRACT. The objective of this study was to evaluate primocane cane training and propagation techniques for the production of long-cane blackberry (Rubus spp.) plants. Seventeen to 29 6-ft-long canes were produced from each semierect 'Triple Crown' and trailing 'Siskiyou' blackberry plant grown on the rotating cross-arm (RCA) trellis and cane training system. By early August, the lateral canes had grown beyond the top wire ≈6 ft above the ground and continued growing downward to the ground. The tips of the lateral canes reached the soil level from mid-August to mid-September at which time they were placed in 1/2-gal pots containing peatbased media. In early Oct. 2009, the tip-rooted lateral canes were cut from the stock plant at the uppermost trellis wire. Among the long-cane plants produced in 2009, 76% of buds in 'Siskiyou' broke, but less than 30% of buds in 'Triple Crown' broke in a heated greenhouse. Flowering occurred in 15% of the shoots that developed on rooted 'Siskiyou' long canes, but the shoots on the long-cane plants of 'Triple Crown' were morphologically vegetative and flowering did not occur. In 2010-11, the long-cane plants were detached from the stock plants in December, January, and March. The numbers of nodes with a flowering shoot improved to 41% and 16% and the number of flowers per shoot increased to two and five flowers on long-cane plants of 'Siskiyou' and 'Triple Crown' blackberry, respectively. © 2011 by the American Society for Horticultural Science.
650 $aMICROPROPAGACIÓN
650 $aPROPAGACIÓN VEGETATIVA
653 $aZARZAMORA
700 1 $aSORIA, J.
773 $tHortTechnology, 2011$gv.21, no.5, p.563-568.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| No hay resultados para la expresión de búsqueda informada registros. |
|
|
