| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
| 2. |  | BAO, L.; LORENZO, M. E.; GRILLÉ, G.; BANCHERO, L.; CAMPELO, E.; FASIOLO, C.; GALVÁN, G.; GONZÁLEZ, P.; RIGHI, E. Enemigos naturales de las principales plagas del cultivo de tomate. Proyecto FPTA 344; Proyecto GCP/URU/031/GFF. Montevideo (UY): UdelaR-Fac.Agronomía, INIA, MGPA-DIGEGRA, 2019. 12 p. Proyecto FPTA 344: Producción e Introducción de Agentes de Control Biológico en el manejo regional integrado de plagas en hortalizas.
Proyecto Plaguicidas-GCP/URU/031/GFF: Fortalecimiento de las capacidades para la gestión ambientalmente...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
22/02/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
22/02/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
ZOPPOLO, R.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; UBERTI, A.; SANTANA, A. S.; CONIBERTI, A.; CABRERA, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
ROBERTO JOSE ZOPPOLO GOLDSCHMIDT, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ BRUNO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. UBERTI, Universidad Federal da Fronteira Sul - UFFS, Chapeco?, Brazil; A. S. SANTANA, Universidad Federal da Fronteira Sul - UFFS, Chapeco?, Brazil; ANDRES CONIBERTI MUNDY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS DANILO CABRERA BOLOGNA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Influence of climatic factors on productivity of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. [Conference paper]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Acta Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 251-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.36 |
|
ISSN : |
0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) |
|
DOI : |
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.36 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Pear (Pyrus communis) is reasonably well-adapted to the average climatic conditions of southern Uruguay, but the climatic variables are not always agreeable for satisfactory production. The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of climatic factors, on yield components (average fruit weight and productivity) of 'Williams' pears on two different rootstocks ('OH×F40' and 'BA29'). The experiment was established in July 2003 at Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria - INIA Las Brujas (34°67?S; 56°37?W). According to Köppen-Geiger classification, the climate of the studied region is ?Cfa? and the soil type is a Typic Argiudoll. To analyze the contribution of climatic factors on productivity of pear trees, a principal component analysis (PCA) was applied using the statistical software R. The correlations between yield components and precipitation, cold units, chill hours (≤7.2°C), relative humidity, evapotranspiration and average temperature were studied from the growing season 2014/15 until 2017/18. Climatic data were collected from the meteorological station at INIA Las Brujas, located less than 500 m from the trial plot. Climatic factors had a more significant effect on 'Williams' productivity than the rootstock factor. One main factor affecting seasonal productivity was chill hours. The average productivity values for the two rootstocks during the cycles 2015/16 and 2017/18 was zero and 7.2 t ha‑1, respectively. During the seasons where chilling was not the limiting factor (>500 chill hours), productivity was significantly higher (25.3 and 42.8 t ha‑1 on average for 2014/15 and 2016/17 seasons, respectively). Precipitation during fruit growth and flower induction and differentiation was another main factor affecting productivity in the current and next season. Even though cumulative yield was significantly higher in OH×F40 compared to BA29 (85.9 vs. 64.8 t ha‑1, respectively) no consistent differences were detected between rootstocks seasonally.
@ International Society for Horticultural Science. MenosAbstract:
Pear (Pyrus communis) is reasonably well-adapted to the average climatic conditions of southern Uruguay, but the climatic variables are not always agreeable for satisfactory production. The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of climatic factors, on yield components (average fruit weight and productivity) of 'Williams' pears on two different rootstocks ('OH×F40' and 'BA29'). The experiment was established in July 2003 at Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria - INIA Las Brujas (34°67?S; 56°37?W). According to Köppen-Geiger classification, the climate of the studied region is ?Cfa? and the soil type is a Typic Argiudoll. To analyze the contribution of climatic factors on productivity of pear trees, a principal component analysis (PCA) was applied using the statistical software R. The correlations between yield components and precipitation, cold units, chill hours (≤7.2°C), relative humidity, evapotranspiration and average temperature were studied from the growing season 2014/15 until 2017/18. Climatic data were collected from the meteorological station at INIA Las Brujas, located less than 500 m from the trial plot. Climatic factors had a more significant effect on 'Williams' productivity than the rootstock factor. One main factor affecting seasonal productivity was chill hours. The average productivity values for the two rootstocks during the cycles 2015/16 and 2017/18 was zero and 7.2 t ha‑1, respectively. During the seasons... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ALTERNATE BEARING; PCA - PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRECIPITATION. |
|
Thesagro : |
PYRUS COMMUNIS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03222naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1061742
005 2021-02-22
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic)
024 7 $a10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.36$2DOI
100 1 $aZOPPOLO, R.
245 $aInfluence of climatic factors on productivity of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. [Conference paper].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein.
520 $aAbstract: Pear (Pyrus communis) is reasonably well-adapted to the average climatic conditions of southern Uruguay, but the climatic variables are not always agreeable for satisfactory production. The objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of climatic factors, on yield components (average fruit weight and productivity) of 'Williams' pears on two different rootstocks ('OH×F40' and 'BA29'). The experiment was established in July 2003 at Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria - INIA Las Brujas (34°67?S; 56°37?W). According to Köppen-Geiger classification, the climate of the studied region is ?Cfa? and the soil type is a Typic Argiudoll. To analyze the contribution of climatic factors on productivity of pear trees, a principal component analysis (PCA) was applied using the statistical software R. The correlations between yield components and precipitation, cold units, chill hours (≤7.2°C), relative humidity, evapotranspiration and average temperature were studied from the growing season 2014/15 until 2017/18. Climatic data were collected from the meteorological station at INIA Las Brujas, located less than 500 m from the trial plot. Climatic factors had a more significant effect on 'Williams' productivity than the rootstock factor. One main factor affecting seasonal productivity was chill hours. The average productivity values for the two rootstocks during the cycles 2015/16 and 2017/18 was zero and 7.2 t ha‑1, respectively. During the seasons where chilling was not the limiting factor (>500 chill hours), productivity was significantly higher (25.3 and 42.8 t ha‑1 on average for 2014/15 and 2016/17 seasons, respectively). Precipitation during fruit growth and flower induction and differentiation was another main factor affecting productivity in the current and next season. Even though cumulative yield was significantly higher in OH×F40 compared to BA29 (85.9 vs. 64.8 t ha‑1, respectively) no consistent differences were detected between rootstocks seasonally. @ International Society for Horticultural Science.
650 $aPYRUS COMMUNIS
653 $aALTERNATE BEARING
653 $aPCA - PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
653 $aPRECIPITATION
700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, P.
700 1 $aUBERTI, A.
700 1 $aSANTANA, A. S.
700 1 $aCONIBERTI, A.
700 1 $aCABRERA, D.
773 $tActa Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 251-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.36
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
