| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | LANGRIDGE, P.; ALAUX, M.; ALMEIDA, N.F.; AMMAR, K.; BAUM, M.; BEKKAOUI, F.; BENTLEY, A.R.; BERES, B.L.; BERGER, B.; BRAUN, H.-J.; BROWN-GUEDIRA, G.; BURT, C.J.; CACCAMO, M.J.; CATTIVELLI, L.; CHARMET, G.; CIVÁN, P.; CLOUTIER, S.; COHAN, J-P.; DEVAUX, P.; DOOHAN, F.M.; DRECCER, M.F.; FERRAHI, M.; GERMAN, S.; GOODWIN, S.B.; GRIFFITHS, S.; GUZMÁN, C.; HANDA, H.; HAWKESFORD, M.J.; HE, Z.; HUTTNER, E.; IKEDA, T.M.; KILIAN, B.; KING, I.P.; KING, J.; KIRKEGAARD, J.A.; LAGE, J.; LE GOUIS, J.; MONDAL, S.; MULLINS, E.; ORDON, F.; ORTIZ-MONASTERIO, J.I.; ÖZKAN, H.; ÖZTÜRK, I.; PEREYRA, S.; POZNIAK, C.J.; QUESNEVILLE, H.; QUINCKE, M.; REBETZKE, G.J.; CHRISTOPH REIF, J.; SAAVEDRA-BRAVO, T.; SCHURR, U.; SHARMA, S.; SINGH, S.K.; SINGH, R.P.; SNAPE, J.W.; TADESSE, W.; TSUJIMOTO, H.; TUBEROSA, R.; WILLIS, T.G.; ZHANG, X. Meeting the challenges facing wheat production: the strategic research agenda of the Global Wheat Initiative. Agronomy, 2022, volume 12, issue 11, 2767. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112767 Article history: Received 26 September 2022; Revised 28 October 2022; Accepted 29 October 2022; Published 7 November 2022. -- Academic Editor: Andreas Katsiotis. -- Corresponding author: Langridge, P.; School of Agriculture, Food and...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
07/10/2024 |
|
Actualizado : |
07/10/2024 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CAFFERA, M.; VÁSQUEZ LAVIN, F.; BARRIENTOS, M.; RODRÍGUEZ ANZA, D.; CARRASCO-LETELIER, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARCELO CAFFERA, Universidad de Montevideo, Montevideo,Uruguay; FELIPE VÁSQUEZ LAVÍN, Universidad del Desarrollo, Concepción, Santiago, Chile; Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Santiago, Chile; Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2), Santiago, Chile; MANUEL BARRIENTOS, Business School, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile; DANIEL RODRÍGUEZ ANZA, Ministerio de Ambiente, República Oriental del Uruguay, Uruguay; LEONIDAS CARRASCO-LETELIER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
The implicit market price of soil erosion: an estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Original article. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultural Economics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12857 -- [Early View]. |
|
ISSN : |
0169-5151; e-ISSN: 1574-0862 |
|
DOI : |
10.1111/agec.12857 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted 13 May 2024, Revised 9 March 2024, Received9 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Marcelo Caffera, Universidad de
Montevideo, Prudencio de Pena 2544, Montevideo, Uruguay. Email: marcaffera@um.edu.uy -- Funding: Latin American and Caribbean Environmental Economics Program, Grant/Award Number: IDEA-018/2017; Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación, Grant/Award Number:
POS_NAC_2015_1_110233. -- |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014.Aunique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per-hectare price of agricultural land (P-value: .012, 95% CI: -.0042, -.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is
$.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial-temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust.
© 2024 International Association of Agricultural Economists. |
|
Palabras claves : |
ÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA; Farmland values; Soil erosion; Spatial spillovers; Spatio-temporal hedonic model; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02439naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1064855
005 2024-10-07
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0169-5151; e-ISSN: 1574-0862
024 7 $a10.1111/agec.12857$2DOI
100 1 $aCAFFERA, M.
245 $aThe implicit market price of soil erosion$ban estimation using a hedonic model with spatial spillovers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
500 $aArticle history: Accepted 13 May 2024, Revised 9 March 2024, Received9 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Marcelo Caffera, Universidad de Montevideo, Prudencio de Pena 2544, Montevideo, Uruguay. Email: marcaffera@um.edu.uy -- Funding: Latin American and Caribbean Environmental Economics Program, Grant/Award Number: IDEA-018/2017; Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación, Grant/Award Number: POS_NAC_2015_1_110233. --
520 $aABSTRACT.- We estimate the implicit market price of soil erosion using quarterly data of 2824 agricultural farms traded in Uruguay between 2000 and 2014.Aunique feature of our estimation is that we allow for possible spatial spillovers. We find evidence of a negative and statistically significant association between erosion and land values. On average, an additional loss of 1% of the original topsoil due to erosion is associated with a direct (own) decrease of .24% in the per-hectare price of agricultural land (P-value: .012, 95% CI: -.0042, -.0005). In 2023 dollars, this is equivalent to a decrease of USD 8.7 in the average price per hectare, or USD 1130 in the price of the average farm. In terms of tons of soil, the average value is $.24 a ton. Finally, considering the 50 km radius of our spatial model, the value of losing 1% of topsoil is $15.8 million. The value of our estimates is sensitive to our measure of erosion and our specification of the spatial-temporal weighting matrix, but the statistical association is robust. © 2024 International Association of Agricultural Economists.
653 $aÁREA DE RECURSOS NATURALES, PRODUCCIÓN Y AMBIENTE - INIA
653 $aFarmland values
653 $aSoil erosion
653 $aSpatial spillovers
653 $aSpatio-temporal hedonic model
653 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aVÁSQUEZ LAVIN, F.
700 1 $aBARRIENTOS, M.
700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ ANZA, D.
700 1 $aCARRASCO-LETELIER, L.
773 $tAgricultural Economics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12857 -- [Early View].
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
