| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
| 2. |  | BRUNO, O.A.; ROMERO, L.A.; USTARROZ, E. Forrajes conservados. ln: Latimori, N.J.; Kloster, A.M., eds. Invernada bovina en zonas mixtas: claves para una actividad más rentable y eficiente. Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina: INTA, 1997. p. 57-92 (INTA Agro 2 de Córdoba)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
|   |
| 9. | | Savio, J.D.; Calcha, N.A.; Comerón, E.A.; Romero, L.A.; Mattiacci, M.R.; Fenoglio, H.F. Efecto de la suplementación con balanceado comercial sobre la producción de vacas Holando argentino alimentadas con pasturas ln: Reunión Técnica sobre Manejo de Pasturas Cultivadas y suplementación para producción lechera, 1985 jul 1-5 : Rafaela, Santa Fé Molestina, C.J. (ed). Memorias. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA/PROCISUR, 1985. p267-276 (IICA-PROCISUR. Diálogo ; 10)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
08/04/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
08/04/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
AUER, A.; VON BELOW, J.; NAHUELHUAL, L.; MASTRANGELO, M.; GONZÁLEZ, A.; GLUCH, M.; VALLEJOS, M.; STAIANO, L.; LATERRA, P.; PARUELO, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
A. AUER, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina.; J. VON BELOW, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Biología Subtropical (Nodo Iguazú/CONICET), Misiones, Argentina.; L. NAHUELHUAL, Universidad Austral de Chile. Valdivia, Chile; Fundación Bariloche, Prov. de Río Negro, Argentina.; M. MASTRANGELO, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Balcarce, 7620, Argentina.; A. GONZÁLEZ, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; M. GLUCH, Fundación Bariloche, Prov. de Río Negro, Argentina.; MARÍA VALLEJOS, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; L. STAIANO, Fac. Agronomía, Univ. Buenos Aires, Argentina; Lab. Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), Inst. Inv. Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), Fac. Agronomía, Univ. Buenos Aires–CONICET, Bs.As., Argentina.; P. LATERRA, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Balcarce, Argentina.; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Mdeo, Uruguay; Depto. Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía and IFEVA, UBA and CONICET, Bs.As., Argentina. |
|
Título : |
The role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Environmental Science and Policy, May 2020, Volume 107, Pages 168-178. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024 |
|
ISSN : |
1462-9011 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 24 May 2019; Revised 21 December 2019; Accepted 27 February 2020; Available online 12 March 2020.
Corresponding author: Auer, A.; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; email:aleauer@gmail.com
Funding text: The following projects funded this study: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN3 095, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grant GEO-1128040) ; PICT 2016-2150; PICT 2015 0672; FONDECYT 1190207. We want to thank all the interviewers and the interviewees for their valuable help. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The relationships among social capital (SC) and collective actions (CA) for nature conservation and management were analyzed across five case studies characterised by specific land-use dynamics in the South American continent. Data on SC and CA were obtained through a semi-structured questionnaire to groups of selected social actors. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify SC components and to evaluate SC across actors and cases. The results reaffirm that: i) the multidimensional nature and complexity of SC; ii) Higher levels of SC are related to higher levels of CA; iii) social actors with developed internal and external SC can better counter adverse conditions through CA compared to actors who only have one type of SC; iv) vulnerable social actors do not necessarily have a higher SC or engage in more CA, despite their higher dependence on natural resources; v) those who hold more power or influence in the territory, have higher levels of SC and CA; vi) vulnerable actors often carry out civil/community, economic and judicial actions, while dominant and structuring actors carry out more educational/technical and political actions. Therefore, the formation and maintenance of SC of the most vulnerable actors and those who support them must be a priority for political action, in order to counteract the asymmetric power relations that lead to the exclusion and marginalization of many rural actors. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd |
|
Palabras claves : |
Ecosystem services; Governance; Social networks; Social-Ecological systems; Stakeholder analysis. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03055naa a2200325 a 4500
001 1061018
005 2020-04-08
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1462-9011
024 7 $a10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024$2DOI
100 1 $aAUER, A.
245 $aThe role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 24 May 2019; Revised 21 December 2019; Accepted 27 February 2020; Available online 12 March 2020. Corresponding author: Auer, A.; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; email:aleauer@gmail.com Funding text: The following projects funded this study: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN3 095, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grant GEO-1128040) ; PICT 2016-2150; PICT 2015 0672; FONDECYT 1190207. We want to thank all the interviewers and the interviewees for their valuable help.
520 $aABSTRACT. The relationships among social capital (SC) and collective actions (CA) for nature conservation and management were analyzed across five case studies characterised by specific land-use dynamics in the South American continent. Data on SC and CA were obtained through a semi-structured questionnaire to groups of selected social actors. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify SC components and to evaluate SC across actors and cases. The results reaffirm that: i) the multidimensional nature and complexity of SC; ii) Higher levels of SC are related to higher levels of CA; iii) social actors with developed internal and external SC can better counter adverse conditions through CA compared to actors who only have one type of SC; iv) vulnerable social actors do not necessarily have a higher SC or engage in more CA, despite their higher dependence on natural resources; v) those who hold more power or influence in the territory, have higher levels of SC and CA; vi) vulnerable actors often carry out civil/community, economic and judicial actions, while dominant and structuring actors carry out more educational/technical and political actions. Therefore, the formation and maintenance of SC of the most vulnerable actors and those who support them must be a priority for political action, in order to counteract the asymmetric power relations that lead to the exclusion and marginalization of many rural actors. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
653 $aEcosystem services
653 $aGovernance
653 $aSocial networks
653 $aSocial-Ecological systems
653 $aStakeholder analysis
700 1 $aVON BELOW, J.
700 1 $aNAHUELHUAL, L.
700 1 $aMASTRANGELO, M.
700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ, A.
700 1 $aGLUCH, M.
700 1 $aVALLEJOS, M.
700 1 $aSTAIANO, L.
700 1 $aLATERRA, P.
700 1 $aPARUELO, J.
773 $tEnvironmental Science and Policy, May 2020, Volume 107, Pages 168-178. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| No hay resultados para la expresión de búsqueda informada registros. |
|
|
