02188naa a2200277 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902200140006002400290007410000180010324501760012126000090029750002980030652009930060465300180159765300210161565300090163665300090164565300220165465300340167665300260171070000260173670000150176270000180177777301150179510614382020-10-29 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d a1095-82907 a10.1093/aob/mcaa1112DOI1 aMATHIASEN, P. aA relic of the pastbcurrent genetic patterns of the palaeoendemic tree Nothofagus macrocarpa were shaped by climatic oscillations in central Chile.h[electronic resource] c2020 aArticle history: Received: 15 October 2019 / Revision requested: 30 December 2019 / Editorial decision: 09 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 June 2020 / Published: 24 June 2020 / Corrected and typeset: 21 July 2020. Supplementary data. Corresponding author: Paula Mathiasen, E-mail pmathiasen@gmail.com aABSTRACT. BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Mediterranean-type forest of central Chile is considered a 'biodiversity hotspot' and a relic of a wider ancient distribution produced by past climatic oscillations. Nothofagus macrocarpa, commonly known as 'roble de Santiago', is a threatened palaeoendemic of this forest, poorly represented in the protected area system. This tree has been repeatedly misidentified as the sister species N. obliqua, which has affected its recognition and protection. Only a few populations of N. macrocarpa remain within a matrix of intensive land use that has been affected by recent forest fires. We tested the hypothesis that current populations of N. macrocarpa are a relic state of a previously widespread range, with the aim of contributing to its identification, its biogeographical history and the design of conservation measures using genetic information. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. aCentral Chile aClimatic changes aENMs aESUs aGenetic diversity aMediterranean-type ecosystems aNothofagus macrocarpa1 aVENEGAS-GONZÁLEZ, A.1 aFRESIA, P.1 aPREMOLI, A.C. tAnnals of Botany, 6 October 2020, Volume 126, Issue 5, Pages 891-904. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa111