| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
22/04/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
22/04/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F.; SAPORITI, T.; LARA, S.; PARODI, P.; SÁNCHEZ, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA CECILIA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; TATIANA SAPORITI NOGUEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Veterinaria.; STEPHANIE YOHANA LARA MARFETAN, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Veterinaria.; PABLO PARODI TEXEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Veterinaria.; JAVIER SÁNCHEZ, University of Prince Edwards Island, Canada. |
|
Título : |
Probability of Rhipicephalus microplus introduction into farms by cattle movement using a Bayesian Belief Network. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, 2019. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.04.009 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
History Article: Received 1 October2018 // Received in revisedform 19March 2019 // Accepted 10April 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
Attempts to eliminate Rhipicephalus microplus from Uruguay have been unsuccessful, and, currently, the country is divided into two areas: a tick-free area and a tick-infested area. In the tick-infested area, different farms face different situations. Some farms are in regions where, due to environmental conditions or a lack of infrastructure, it is difficult to eliminate R. microplus, and the only option is to control it. In contrast, other farms can attempt complete removal. Before deciding whether a farmer should attempt to eliminate R. microplus, the probability of reintroduction must be evaluated. The objective of this study was to develop a probabilistic model
based on a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to assess the likelihood of a farm becoming infested with R. microplus via the introduction of tick-infested cattle. Only the tick-infested area was considered in the development of this model. Nine variables related to environmental conditions and biosecurity measures, with a focus on cattle
movement, were considered. Three different sources of data were used to populate the BBN model: data from the literature; a representative national survey from 2016; and a survey developed to identify biosecurity practices on farms. Model sensitivity and specificity were assessed, and an overall accuracy of 92% was obtained. The
model was applied to 33 farms located in the tick-infested area. For one farm, the probability of introduction of R. microplus was 1%; for three farms, the probability was between 21% and 34%; for seven farms, it was between 66% and 76%; and for 22 farms, the probability was greater than 83%. This model was useful for estimating the
probability of the introduction of R. microplus into farms, making it possible to assess the impact that the evaluated biosecurity measures have on the probability of introduction and, thus, guiding more objective decision making about the control or elimination of R. microplus from farms. MenosAttempts to eliminate Rhipicephalus microplus from Uruguay have been unsuccessful, and, currently, the country is divided into two areas: a tick-free area and a tick-infested area. In the tick-infested area, different farms face different situations. Some farms are in regions where, due to environmental conditions or a lack of infrastructure, it is difficult to eliminate R. microplus, and the only option is to control it. In contrast, other farms can attempt complete removal. Before deciding whether a farmer should attempt to eliminate R. microplus, the probability of reintroduction must be evaluated. The objective of this study was to develop a probabilistic model
based on a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to assess the likelihood of a farm becoming infested with R. microplus via the introduction of tick-infested cattle. Only the tick-infested area was considered in the development of this model. Nine variables related to environmental conditions and biosecurity measures, with a focus on cattle
movement, were considered. Three different sources of data were used to populate the BBN model: data from the literature; a representative national survey from 2016; and a survey developed to identify biosecurity practices on farms. Model sensitivity and specificity were assessed, and an overall accuracy of 92% was obtained. The
model was applied to 33 farms located in the tick-infested area. For one farm, the probability of introduction of R. microplus was 1%; for three farms, the pro... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORK; CATTLE TICK ELIMINATI; RHIPICEPHALUS MICROPLUS; RISK ASSESSMENT. |
|
Thesagro : |
PLAGAS DE ANIMALES. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L72 Plagas de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02862naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1059731
005 2019-04-22
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.04.009$2DOI
100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C.
245 $aProbability of Rhipicephalus microplus introduction into farms by cattle movement using a Bayesian Belief Network.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aHistory Article: Received 1 October2018 // Received in revisedform 19March 2019 // Accepted 10April 2019.
520 $aAttempts to eliminate Rhipicephalus microplus from Uruguay have been unsuccessful, and, currently, the country is divided into two areas: a tick-free area and a tick-infested area. In the tick-infested area, different farms face different situations. Some farms are in regions where, due to environmental conditions or a lack of infrastructure, it is difficult to eliminate R. microplus, and the only option is to control it. In contrast, other farms can attempt complete removal. Before deciding whether a farmer should attempt to eliminate R. microplus, the probability of reintroduction must be evaluated. The objective of this study was to develop a probabilistic model based on a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to assess the likelihood of a farm becoming infested with R. microplus via the introduction of tick-infested cattle. Only the tick-infested area was considered in the development of this model. Nine variables related to environmental conditions and biosecurity measures, with a focus on cattle movement, were considered. Three different sources of data were used to populate the BBN model: data from the literature; a representative national survey from 2016; and a survey developed to identify biosecurity practices on farms. Model sensitivity and specificity were assessed, and an overall accuracy of 92% was obtained. The model was applied to 33 farms located in the tick-infested area. For one farm, the probability of introduction of R. microplus was 1%; for three farms, the probability was between 21% and 34%; for seven farms, it was between 66% and 76%; and for 22 farms, the probability was greater than 83%. This model was useful for estimating the probability of the introduction of R. microplus into farms, making it possible to assess the impact that the evaluated biosecurity measures have on the probability of introduction and, thus, guiding more objective decision making about the control or elimination of R. microplus from farms.
650 $aPLAGAS DE ANIMALES
653 $aBAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORK
653 $aCATTLE TICK ELIMINATI
653 $aRHIPICEPHALUS MICROPLUS
653 $aRISK ASSESSMENT
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
700 1 $aSAPORITI, T.
700 1 $aLARA, S.
700 1 $aPARODI, P.
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ, J.
773 $tTicks and Tick-borne Diseases, 2019.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
03/01/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/11/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
GARMENDIA, G.; PATTARINO, L.; NEGRIN, C.; MARTÍNEZ-SILVEIRA, A.; PEREYRA, S.; WARD, T.J.; VERO, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
GABRIELA GARMENDIA, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, General Flores 2124, 11800, Montevideo, Uruguay.; LUCIANA PATTARINO, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.; CAMILA NEGRIN TORRES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.; ADALGISA MARTÍNEZ-SILVEIRA, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.; SILVIA ANTONIA PEREYRA CORREA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; TODD J. WARD, Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology, USDA-ARS, 1815 N, University St.Peoria, IL, 61604, USA.; SILVANA VERO, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Species composition, toxigenic potential and aggressiveness of Fusarium isolates causing Head Blight of barley in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Food Microbiology, v. 76, December 2018, p. 426-433. |
|
ISSN : |
1095-9998 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.fm.2018.07.005 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 22 September 2017// Revised 14 March 2018//Accepted 12 July 2018// Available online 17 July 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT:Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a major constraint to barley production that substantially reduces yield and grain quality. FHB is also a major food safety concern because FHB pathogens contaminate grain with trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. DNA sequence-based analyses and in-vitro toxin assessments were used to characterize the species and trichothecene chemotype composition of FHB pathogens on barley in Uruguay. F. graminearum was the dominant species (89.7%), and three other members of the F. graminearum species complex (FGSC) were identified as FHB pathogens of barley in Uruguay for the first time. Other minor contributors to FHB species diversity included F. poae, F. avenaceum, F. pseudograminearum and an unnamed species from the F. incarnatumequiseti species complex (FIESC). Most isolates (89.7%) had the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON) trichothecene type. However, the results expanded the known area of occurrence within Uruguay for the nivalenol (NIV) toxin type, which was observed among isolates from three species of the FGSC, F. pseudograminearum, and F. poae. Isolates with the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) or NX-2 toxin types were not observed, although a previously published multilocus genotyping assay was updated to identify NX-2 strains. Analyses of population structure and comparisons with FHB isolates from wheat in Uruguay indicated that F. graminearum constitutes a single genetic population with no evidence of population differentiation related to the sampled hosts. Inter and intraspecific differences were observed in aggressiveness toward four barley genotypes with different levels of resistance to FHB, and in general nivalenol producers were the least aggressive isolates. Sensitivity to metconazole was approximately 10 times higher than was detected for tebuconazole. This is the first report regarding tebuconazole and metconazole sensitivity for Fusarium species causing FHB in barley in Uruguay, and constitutes an important starting point for monitoring temporal or spatial changes in FGSC sensitivity, which is critical to define FHB management practices. MenosABSTRACT:Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a major constraint to barley production that substantially reduces yield and grain quality. FHB is also a major food safety concern because FHB pathogens contaminate grain with trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. DNA sequence-based analyses and in-vitro toxin assessments were used to characterize the species and trichothecene chemotype composition of FHB pathogens on barley in Uruguay. F. graminearum was the dominant species (89.7%), and three other members of the F. graminearum species complex (FGSC) were identified as FHB pathogens of barley in Uruguay for the first time. Other minor contributors to FHB species diversity included F. poae, F. avenaceum, F. pseudograminearum and an unnamed species from the F. incarnatumequiseti species complex (FIESC). Most isolates (89.7%) had the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON) trichothecene type. However, the results expanded the known area of occurrence within Uruguay for the nivalenol (NIV) toxin type, which was observed among isolates from three species of the FGSC, F. pseudograminearum, and F. poae. Isolates with the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) or NX-2 toxin types were not observed, although a previously published multilocus genotyping assay was updated to identify NX-2 strains. Analyses of population structure and comparisons with FHB isolates from wheat in Uruguay indicated that F. graminearum constitutes a single genetic population with no evidence of population differentiation related ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BARLEY; MYCOTOXINS. |
|
Thesagro : |
CEBADA; FUSARIUM; MICOTOXINAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03057naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1059407
005 2019-11-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1095-9998
024 7 $a10.1016/j.fm.2018.07.005$2DOI
100 1 $aGARMENDIA, G.
245 $aSpecies composition, toxigenic potential and aggressiveness of Fusarium isolates causing Head Blight of barley in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Received 22 September 2017// Revised 14 March 2018//Accepted 12 July 2018// Available online 17 July 2018.
520 $aABSTRACT:Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a major constraint to barley production that substantially reduces yield and grain quality. FHB is also a major food safety concern because FHB pathogens contaminate grain with trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. DNA sequence-based analyses and in-vitro toxin assessments were used to characterize the species and trichothecene chemotype composition of FHB pathogens on barley in Uruguay. F. graminearum was the dominant species (89.7%), and three other members of the F. graminearum species complex (FGSC) were identified as FHB pathogens of barley in Uruguay for the first time. Other minor contributors to FHB species diversity included F. poae, F. avenaceum, F. pseudograminearum and an unnamed species from the F. incarnatumequiseti species complex (FIESC). Most isolates (89.7%) had the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON) trichothecene type. However, the results expanded the known area of occurrence within Uruguay for the nivalenol (NIV) toxin type, which was observed among isolates from three species of the FGSC, F. pseudograminearum, and F. poae. Isolates with the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) or NX-2 toxin types were not observed, although a previously published multilocus genotyping assay was updated to identify NX-2 strains. Analyses of population structure and comparisons with FHB isolates from wheat in Uruguay indicated that F. graminearum constitutes a single genetic population with no evidence of population differentiation related to the sampled hosts. Inter and intraspecific differences were observed in aggressiveness toward four barley genotypes with different levels of resistance to FHB, and in general nivalenol producers were the least aggressive isolates. Sensitivity to metconazole was approximately 10 times higher than was detected for tebuconazole. This is the first report regarding tebuconazole and metconazole sensitivity for Fusarium species causing FHB in barley in Uruguay, and constitutes an important starting point for monitoring temporal or spatial changes in FGSC sensitivity, which is critical to define FHB management practices.
650 $aCEBADA
650 $aFUSARIUM
650 $aMICOTOXINAS
653 $aBARLEY
653 $aMYCOTOXINS
700 1 $aPATTARINO, L.
700 1 $aNEGRIN, C.
700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ-SILVEIRA, A.
700 1 $aPEREYRA, S.
700 1 $aWARD, T.J.
700 1 $aVERO, S.
773 $tFood Microbiology$gv. 76, December 2018, p. 426-433.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
